Table

Contractor M&Y(Comics)

Reviews' statics

Comics rank	Rank 4,191/in 4,252 titles (Total -27.00)	Rank 4,190 <= => Rank 4,192
Comics average pnts rank	Rank 653/in 711 titles (Average -1.35(Bad))	Rank 652 <= => Rank 654
Comics rank of 2006	Rank 176/in 184 titles	Rank 175 <= => Rank 177

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Image gallery

Information about this title

Akira Akatsuki
Weekly Boys Jump
SHUEISHA

Released:2006/12/11 in Japan End:2007/02/26 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	ComicsRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Bad(-1.35)	4,191	42.46	-27.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	10,610	23	20
Outside Japan	152	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

5.0%

15.0%

10.0%

30.0%

Added percentage

20%

30%

40%

70%

100%

Summary

20%

10.0%

70%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14
9 1 1 4 0 0 1 0 2

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/04/09 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Tamekichi Provider: 16709 Host:16684 Browser: 20420
Although excessive disrepute was not written, it said clearly and was not more interesting than PORTA.
an incomprehensible hero's way of speaking utou(ed) and cut - Is it justice justice だっけ?
they are the comics of only ita い -

2008/03/28 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by 小島かじり虫 Provider: 28890 Host:28967 Browser: 3674

[Good point]
Although it is royal road-like as skill of drawing being very high and power being contained not only in molding of a character but sex appeal, it is finished in the work which whose originality is various and does not have the beaten spot of 非 very much with a 惹き attachment る story and the attractive character etc in a reader.

[Bad point]
It is only considered that it is the close in only 11 weeks.
Probably it thought that it turned out what things the contents of a story are, and possibly the more attractive character had appeared, if the series continued more.
Like it, the order of printing becomes the lower one, and is completed, and it can be said that it has finished with the result regrettable as a reader.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
I think that the comment which finished reading an all story are remarkable masterpieces.
It is like [ to which a week boy jump is also located in the more wonderful one ].
Although it has ended by the close, I want to serialize new work by the comics magazine a little early.
Evaluation presupposes "It is very good."

2008/03/04 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 闇夜のフェンリル Provider: 48110 Host:48018 Browser: 6386
only skill of drawing is the impression ...
it is There is no originality in the story by which no device is in a battle and by which no charm is in a character.

2008/03/03 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Saikutopasu Provider: 23455 Host:23399 Browser: 7590
Surely, there are many dissatisfied points in these comics.
There is admiration which the place which is not so is gikushaku(ing) with the gag part, and it may have idled considering a character as a method of individuality attachment.
However, to me, these comics do not separate disagreeable.
It is because there will be no atmosphere of the whole work with where and he will have an old feeling, if it is said [ why ] whether be.
No, this is not said in a bad meaning.
call it a kind of "taste " which has decreased to the latest comics, such as 災獣 which is not in an intelligible boys' comics-story with where and has touch like a special-effects monster in it intently though it is supernatural creature-existence, -- there was time with る and it was a good impression there my sensitivity itself is only only old -- かも知れませ -- although -- Moreover, I thought that it was also good that it was able to fold comparatively finely, closing 10 round (it is past [ cramming ] somewhat).
This is except and an important thing and it could be called courtesy to the work not to make not only comics but any works into to go up like a rocket and come down like a stick, but to make a tale finish.
although evaluation may be somewhat sweet -- " -- it is made good " I think that I want Mr.
暁月 to achieve revenge by 次回作 taking advantage of experience of this work next.

2007/10/07 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Purasudee Provider: 9448 Host:9159 Browser: 6287
[Good point] Almost nothing.
[Bad point] うっ letting [ pass ] さ of gag.
Puerility of a battle scene A hero's ending [Comprehensive evaluation] It is bad.
I think that it was a very crude work.
It is looking and is iraira きます.
It was a severe work to the extent that I read and "the kana which is not finished あぁ and early [ this / comics ]" has been thought by eye four talks.
The thing justice [ of a hero's way of speaking ] !
was really disagreeable.
Since a good point is not found, evaluation is the worst.

2007/05/26 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 三段 Provider: 12953 Host:13058 Browser: 6342
This work is low evaluation battle feeling comics which can say it also as tradition and which have carried out the halfway close.
In a character, a setup and a story, and all, it is unattractive, and even an important battle is delicate ...
It says or is hard to read a battle scene according to the mood of the moment ...
Since it is the story which まぁ and the child considered, although it does not those[ with a method ]-ま (smile).
Although it seems that there are many opinions that Mr.
朱雀 of a hero calls repeatedly "うな" "justice" and that 迷 zerifu (?), and he is unpleasant, it is the ant which "is privately うな." Although there was adult-ized deployment, are is ...
all over.
Although the white tigers of the heroine are omake みたい, in addition sex appeal kyara, he also has many kakkoii scenes.
however -- true -- a hot spring and costume play -- it comes out, it becomes cheap kyara and is severe especially the regrettable second half ...
Mr.
洸太 who is the man in the street A cannot be in about [ which is not amusing ], even if a fool of the deployment from the appearance of one talk is made in the top where the significance of existence is unknown.
Mr.
玄武 ...
If it says from a conclusion, I can think only mere air kyara and unnecessary kyara which appeared suddenly before the close.
Two persons of seven talks are "If it cannot harness, don't take out" ...
Although a setup which does not feel originality perfectly that a hero (and friend) pushes down 災獣, making full use of Jinriki is good anyhow, 災獣将 is out of the question.
I will think じゃん which should be taking out only 災獣 ordinarily.
Or [ that the way attacked with some / honesty and / battle stop てお sex appeal still continued ] (smile).
Evaluation "is very bad." very much -- there is nothing pleasantly -- it was condition But if it is this level, I think that there are some persons who accept.
Since it is neither a picture nor a poor って reason.
although it, an editorial department, and some readers tend to mistake -- ten talks -- since it was come out and closed -- or [ which is not interesting / having divided and come out and having serialized over a long period of time ] ...
It is the present condition which the comics which can actually be regarded as interesting only in the first ten talks do not almost have into a hit comic.
If it is considered, a jump will be closed too much (it is ...
although there is an unavoidable thing even if surely closed).

2007/04/22 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Okadasan Provider: 13075 Host:13007 Browser: 4184
[a good point] -- it is - in a certain reason -- ろ [ ^^ ] b [a bad point] -- a hero does not care for it to it which is [ be / うな / it ] conspicuous in repeated calls of justice -- it is kiln じ餓鬼 when taken in from w banana -- a ろ白虎優 name is why together with 朱雀 mikoto or the excrement to say -- w -- moreover -- an inability w battle -- excrement -- it is -- about / what the first grader in an elementary school considered in a naming sense, a form, etc.
of enemy kyara /, and w [comprehensive evaluation] -- I w want this work whether the comic was better and to come again constantly from a boy jump -- w evaluation -- the worst -- with except [ no / this ]

2007/03/14 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Yuuji Provider: 5705 Host:5632 Browser: 4487
It gakkari(ed) for deployment which can say it only as self-abandonment.
A style of painting is bad and 画力 is insufficient for sex appeal, in it, it is thin to the extent that there is no having seen until now in a battle, and to it, I think that it is a work.
It is called what or this author thinks that he is suitable for illustrator rather than a cartoonist.
Although the so so attractive picture was covered when writing carefully, when being followed to 〆 OFF every week, this author's merit did not come out but the poor portion was thrown into relief ..
However, and a result is and has no cousin.

2007/03/04 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 武信君 Provider: 22509 Host:22290 Browser: 8090
Although it was completely mashi when compared with the porutakaya last year, tsugihagi, and 斬, was the subject point the work which can be seen?
In the battle thing which treated four God first of all, if compared with "闇神 kou", it can completely read, it was a method of れた, and if compared with the members of a series last year also in 画力, I will think that it is a sufficiently high level.
I think that it is because it was the battle comics-story which tends to be even anywhere [ a lack / the impact of a character / and anywhere ] including a hero as the greatest reason of the short-term close.
how to stretch a hint -- completely -- と -- since there was nothing so that you could say, an honest continuation was not worrisome About the heroine's costume play depiction Since the jump of honest now fully maintained the demand of 萌, and the balance of supply by ToLove る or emuzero, I regard it with there having been no necessity as individual.

2007/02/26 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 爆音 Provider: 8677 Host:8628 Browser: 5234
reading -- as -- sokosoko -- interesting -- carrying out ..
although unlike the series version the heroine's A name etc.
was functioning as an assistant of mikoto rather than was cumbersome ...
the series version -- useless -- costume play & -- it was regrettable to have become by 駄 kyara on the candid service scene something し [ the talk also merely had only the tedious impression ] ..
Since it read although it was the worst when it was the series version, and the limits version was a sokosoko 読めた work, it is "very bad" at large 甘.

2007/02/22 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Pepo Provider: 46334 Host:46290 Browser: 4184
Evaluation is changed.
Although it was good at the time of the beginning, was that was interesting too also as for this work only the beginning?
Something has already been touch that it is to it, the back.
Popularity should not come out simply right [ that ].
although it will seem to be the close somehow at next week -- level じゃ well to that extent in a boy jump -- is it a way an unavoidable end?

2007/02/06 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by 皐月 Provider: 2177 Host:1876 Browser: 4926
I think that these comics are not good.
Is this useless when it comes to a series although it thought that it was interesting at the time of complete?
A picture is confused too much first and it is 。.
It does not understand unsatisfactorily well what has happened.
And charm is not felt [ heroes, sub kyara, and / all ].
About an enemy, I will think whether it is good anyhow.
And although it seems that costume play is variously made the white tiger, it does not understand well wanting what to say for the time being.
Gag is also slippery.
it obtains and is an overstatement [ twist ] I want you to come again.

2007/01/30 Good [Original Japanese review]
by toshiki Provider: 12938 Host:12939 Browser: 7600
I feel for the time being that there is nothing for janpu っぽく.
But it is although it thinks that there may be such comics.
.
Although mind other comics are too great is also carried out ..

2007/01/29 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Mebiusu Provider: 16857 Host:16826 Browser: 3875
Useless comics of a typical weekly boy jump.
Even the impression completely brand[ time-tested ]-ized as "takaya", a "tsugihagi drift writer", "斬" "jump useless comics", etc.
is felt in recent years.
daring serialize "the petty work" intentionally, so that such an illusion is received -- しか -- the level of a newcomer in recent years and a young writer has fallen surprising to the extent that it cannot consider Does the future of a magazine become anxious extremely?
even for a time -- circulation No.1 of Japan -- super- -- a major boy magazine -- things -- an editorial department and the author -- he does not understand -- しか -- it cannot say .
if it will be the ore of the diagram which takes out a big hit behind and it should turn out that it is not materialized as goods in the state where it does not polish at all even if, even if who thinks describe evaluation of the work itself -- also obtaining -- so far -- individuality, the feature, and が -- if few -- in any way ...
For the time being, can't a hero's character sympathize?
The human being of the first meeting is knocked first, or there is also no method of comrades.
災獣 -- however it might also see the battle scene with things like a supernatural creature with a favorable eye, it was not praised, either Although seemingly this writer is the person who had the career of there there with the coterie magazine for adults, し [ comparatively / the / also in female kyara, there is no charm ].
As for a good place, one does not exist at all.
The contents are "trashes" without exaggeration also with a taste it is thin and thin truly.
a jump is passed by a rival's weekly boy magazine once again -- also coming out -- probably it should carry out and the head should be cooled It is limited even if it says [ since it is a newcomer, please see leniently, and ].

2007/01/29 Good [Original Japanese review]
by ディルfan Provider: 1602 Host:1718 Browser: 3646
the beginning -- "く -- it is -- the kana which has risen just for a moment recently [ ♪ ] when this laver will become pleasant by -」って読ん if better た gets used "zazzaa" and "どっ -- deep しょ-" and hen words are impressive -- * -- the "promise gag" in appearance in the work -- or [ touch that something is also good ] Since it can read happily recently, it is "good."

2007/01/10 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by LOVEN Provider: 53338 Host:53269 Browser: 3874
I think that evaluation will be attached, although it has still started just.
It seems that this work, how, and the premonition which had released the smell of air comics out of the first talk came true.
it is hard to see a picture first -- it is supreme Is [ what in addition to it, it is called, and ] it a picture like the comics for children?
I feel that there is almost no element uncanny deja vu and original for the contents.
A hero is merely uzai intently.
Especially a way of speaking is uzai supremely.
(although that was right from the first talk) Still, from a series start, although it is about two months, it runs to sex appeal, and an eye is not applied, either.
It was thought that it was a work like the model of the close.
Since are also attaches the worst suddenly, I will load a future comeback with expectation of 1 fragment ぶん位 of 砂粒, and evaluation will presuppose that it is very bad.

2006/12/23 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 鬼山カズノコ Provider: 5644 Host:5458 Browser: 7571
Is it OO magazine graduate uniquely in the author って jump of these comics?
It knew for the first time.
Now, it is the worst if evaluation of these comics is told to solo Naoiri.
Although it is a pattern first, there are very too many lines and it is hard to see them.
Next, although it is a story, there is also no 面白み by the terrible and beta story.
Furthermore, it is the 敵ばっ loan in which the schoolchild thought also of the enemy, dasa い also of it is carried out, and it is 。.
(Also naming) Although it is next a character, existing semantic kore may be the most disagreeable reason.
Although it is a hero's 朱雀 mikoto first, it has said in "うな --", "justice", and ばっ, and is very noisy.
し [ it is still gaki in appearance etc.
].
Next, it is not attractive although it is a white 虎優 name.
It is at character.
And costume play is carried out vainly.
It does not see and shine.
Finally please do not carry out costume play to futility.
Above

2006/12/23 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by TCC Provider: 8376 Host:8446 Browser: 4184
Jinriki -- a contractor -- it is one corner describing saigasuto (it saying that naming is easy or being W) which causes a calamity with a party with special power fighting of WJ new serial comic strips Although my A name who decorated the series start number with the cover with the hero felt that reona of KOF was resembled at the moment of seeing, the pattern which a line becomes obstructive by halves and is hard to see is a difficulty.
It reads and eye て gets tired.
Contrary to the appearance, a hero is kyara using old-man language which was seen by somewhere, and does not have freshness, and kyara of speech and conduct is also sultry.
My A name of an assistant is also incompetent and the significance of existence is seldom felt.
the members of a new series of WJ, and a certain conjuror which started this week -- a trash -- although the comics of the author of comics also went into the eye, though regrettable, there is no impression that all are not much good although 画力 [ Mr.
Ken Obata's new work article ] without a complaint is also touch called the kana which encourages expectations somehow conjointly and there is neither 斬 nor tsugihagi severely -- joke omission -- training below Yomiuri -- the present condition of a capability editorial department is serious Although it is made "common" evaluation with a grinding sound at present, it is the premonition which is likely to be closed with now.

2006/12/21 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Tokotontonkotsu Provider: 12661 Host:12697 Browser: 2989(Mobile)
It is a battle comics maniac somehow.
The four-week continuation new series which the jump began on a grand scale.
It is attention whether it becomes a quality more than the work closed sure enough.
Is this touch with a meaning unknown especially?
It 暑苦 by not being powerful, it says and is touch.
Since it did not necessarily read so that it had still started just and sushi and where indicated concretely that it was bad, it is "bad" from the impression of a view.
It will be dependent on a future trend anyway.

Next / Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.