Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 3,474/in 4,168 titles (Total -1.00/Deviation 48.24) Rank 3,473 <= => Rank 3,475
Comics ranking of 2003: Rank 68/in 90 titles Rank 67 <= => Rank 69

Haman in Axis(Comics)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImages
Information about this title

Yukihiro Inoue
Monthly Gundam Ace
Kadokawa Shoten Publishing Co.,Ltd.

Released:2003 in Japan End:2006 in Japan
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageComicsRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanGood(-0.25)3,47448.24-1.00 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan2,62954
Outside Japan16200

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0102001
Percentage0.0%25.0%0.0%50.0%0.0%0.0%25.0%
Added percentage0%25%25%75%75%75%100%
Summary25%50.0%25%
                                                                                                    

Views for recent 8 days
Total2019181716151413
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation New!
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
All
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/08/08 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Yunibaasu Provider: 1942 Host:1857 Browser: 3875
Were they ordinarily interesting comics full of gags?
Even now, it is slightly regrettable to have carried out the series end.
"It is !
a little." characteristic words, such as words to say, and "nani, -", -- 回しで -- I had you make it laugh fairly The picture is also felt refreshed and is readable.
Even free has a fault ...
It is this work.
Since it will be hard to enjoy itself if it has not been read, since it is the parody of the comics "the portrait of a young comet" I hear that す is so boring that this "portrait of a young comet" is surprised.

2006/10/21 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Mebiusu Provider: 16857 Host:16826 Browser: 3875
Although an honest cancer dam is not so detailed, the stage of this work is a talk between Z from the first.
However, even if this work is not so detailed, it is not a work that a translation cannot be understood and enjoyed.
once -- は -- it is the parody of "the portrait of a young comet" which was the same cancer dam ace's 連載作 The author is Yukihiro Inoue of super-迷作 "doruhira" which remains in that jump in history in a bad meaning.
It was a certain semantic correct answer which a disagreeable premonition carries out at this time.
the story which incoherent-reaches to an extreme and is not at first 連載作 "doruhira" -- on the way -- since -- that a picture changes, so that it says whether another person is drawing mostly たり -- (author -- the opinion that flight and the assistant drew [ him ] in the middle of the series with leading) There is also no method of comrades anyhow, and it is a severe work, and after that, a plagiarism disturbance is caused in complete, Shueisha is dried, work is somehow got by Kadokawa by 伝手 of Mr.
Hiroshi Tamaru, a friend, and it becomes a series of 本作.
the time of reading this work first, although I was the fan of the Tamaru work -- "-- Mr.
Tamaru's work -- also coming out -- し a picture is a little different -- なぁ ...
" -- a network -- Inoue -- Yukihiro -- it knows that they were the above "notorious" problem writers, and real, when a writer is questioned -- と -- it is convinced Doesn't this man reflect on having caused the plagiarism disturbance at all?
This work is the まんま Tamaru work that much.
since it seems that there is also time which is a friend from its high school days, and was acting as Mr.
Tamaru's assistant -- him -- Mr.
Tamaru is acting as the ghostwriter whether pakuri is done by official recognition, and whether a fact top is 作 -- it conjectured that it was "if it is it -- it is pakuri by "he official recognition that there is" no it although an original and Hiroshi Tamaru", and a credit should be put in -- it will be -- probably .
Do you think that it is what must not make it its own work as it is to have stolen his work in the reed time although the meaning made into the cartoonist can estimate?
Although a possibility that I have had Mr.
Tamaru think possibly cannot deny a name and neta, either ...
Probably, a credit should be put in if it is it.
As a common sense problem.
Although Mr.
Tamaru who has allowed plagiarism as "since it is a friend" also has a problem somewhat, does the pride as a pro cartoonist tell Mr.
Inoue what is not, or ?
from it?
けど which will not be in such 作品描 if it is ...
I think that it is the direction which has improved as parody gag of a cancer dam.
If it carries out for extracting plagiarism doubt.
I think that it must not evaluate by saying that the stance as this Mr.
Inoue's cartoonist is considered.
Although the cartoonist with the career which was someone's former assistants is influenced not a little in many cases of the "teacher", I think so far that the まんまって is what is not very much.
The work itself is by no means bad.
I wanted to raise the "highest", supposing the author is "Hiroshi Tamaru." However, when it comes to "the plagiarism work of he official recognition", the talk is completely different.
It is not necessary to say evaluation.

2005/12/24 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 貞吉7 Provider: 47133 Host:47311 Browser: 6885
if it is somehow called gag of the cancer dam ace -- having finished (it needing) -- existence of toni たけ be too large although a useless っぽい impression will be received as it is yuru い gag ...
appropriate [ concluding that the Haboro coal mine is also said with feeling /-like / INL / 箸休 ] ] .
-- sensuous -- the four-frame strip cartoon between graphic novel magazines -- is it みたいな?

Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved