Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 4,072/in 4,168 titles (Total -16.96/Deviation 44.64) Rank 4,071 <= => Rank 4,073
Comics ranking of 2006: Rank 168/in 176 titles Rank 167 <= => Rank 169

Imouto Gundam(Comics)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Yasuyuki Tokumitsu
Monthly Gundam Ace Kadokawa Shoten Publishing Co.,Ltd.

Released:2006/03 in Japan End:2007/12 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	ComicsRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very bad(-2.12)	4,072	44.64	-16.96

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	3,465	8	8
Outside Japan	77	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

25.0%

0.0%

12.5%

62.5%

Added percentage

25%

37.5%

100%

Summary

25.0%

75%

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/04/21 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by WIN.COM Provider: 26377 Host:26386 Browser: 6395
This is severe although it purchased since he liked the comics of ganota and such laver.
first -- a person -- electric wave past てついて -- the cold is memorized not to mention it is bad Core past る neta, such as a card builder of it and light ganota leaving behind like oneself.
It already carries out [ 興ざ ].
And skill of drawing which is insufficient for sprouting and enjoying oneself as grapple comics too much.
Although the skill of drawing which he can tell people's thing does not have, this work which was probably written with the above-mentioned concept by commercial comics has a degree also in the shortage of skill of drawing.
Although the badness of skill of drawing is compensated and there should just be more than contents like a gouache (it is ...
although it hears well that the gouache became mannerism in the second half and finished it as gudaguda), there is no it in this work as above-mentioned.
Although it could still allow when it was member comics, this is the clear commercial comics which ISBN attached, and I was not able to allow these contents in any way.
Since I was an unfavorable criticism ばっ loan in the reason for saying until now, although he did not want to attach such evaluations and they were carried out, although I will attach this work except this evaluation, there is seldom.
It is the "worst." I wanted very much to see early Mr.
Tony たけざき's comics which carried out simultaneous purchase during perusal.

2008/03/21 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 赤い水性のシャア Provider: 12661 Host:12507 Browser: 2904(Mobile)
It says clearly and is the work of delicate touch.
probably -- an object -- cancer dam liking + -- sprouting -- a girl -- although it is probably aimed at the favorite person -- contents unpleasant to a pure cancer dam fan Although it turns out enough that the author is a cancer dam fan, story composition since it was thought that a certain human being reads the knowledge to which a reader probably also applies to it correspondingly, as if it showed off self knowledge cannot be obtained.
Since skill of drawing and composition power are bad, there is nothing by the comics which were able to be read not much.
Contents which may incur a cancer dam fan's Imperial wrath above all.
Evaluation is the "worst." Are they the comics as which he also feels a feeling of dislike considerably?

2008/01/15 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Mondo Provider: 18003 Host:17757 Browser: 4671
With 画力 nothing, contents nothing, and no sense.
It is bad in all portions.
This cannot be obtained although he likes the cancer dam itself.
It is thought that its 画力 does not tend to be taken into consideration, either, but tends to sprout, and the deer which has only shown off and has not constituted the contents as a story, either also tends to have maniac itself knowledge to the route.
(Is merely it clear?
picture which does not become certain) .
It is even unpleasantly.

2007/11/29 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by H&J Provider: 10191 Host:9988 Browser: 8090
"-- 画力 regrettable for sprouting and aiming at " Composition poor for calling it a "parody." The sense which is too bad for calling it "gag." "Mr.
dark 爆おたく of several steps" is less unsatisfactory.
Since it is the work born by self-satisfaction of the author who wants to exhibit a hobby, it is not accepted other than those whose mental wavelength corresponds.
Evaluation: It is very bad.

2007/09/12 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 11573 Host:11842 Browser: 5234
Supposing "the cancer dam SEED" becomes a trash by the dramatist without the great talent, and the supervisor who appointed it, you say that this is the work of only the bad laver out of which the bad laver of cancer dam likes and a fan's extended writer has come in the distorted form.
Probably it is unavoidable contents and there are not little those whose head is not hard and who thinks "what じゃこりゃ?" by sprouting to 1st neta at grapple action of G cancer dam, adding a beauty girl, and the hobby bad for the reason being opened fully, even if an ordinary cancer dam fan sees and it is called ......
by cod roe 怒る, although the contents are not necessarily passionate cancer dam fans that it is trivial and anyhow independently.
well, if comics of this sort have a lowbrow and the remarkable portion which may be unable to be regarded as it not being the head slowly, which was pain at mechakucha even if it carried out and was hearing the conversation scene and which carries out and ran to the electric wave too much and the cancer dam SEED is made true for gag, they may become such laver If all the past cancer dam younger sister kyara and others who told ririina to riina and riizu and told mayu and others to soshie read to the sailor when seeing this well, it may become that it is likely to reverse.
It is the work with which this cannot but retreat by from 1 although it is me who am not independently the passionate fan of a cancer dam, either and do not regard the cancer dam as it being the highest animation.
those whom a cancer dam fan does not have, either -- if -- ょ - there is nothing -- bad laver past る which made displeasure only incur, and the strange hobby was made [ る ] into the てんこ peak, and made it run recklessly further -- only the same displeasure as a seed and a feeling of dislike can seethe with a distorted work, and it can attach to it like a seed in addition to the worst evaluation

2007/08/13 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Yunibaasu Provider: 1942 Host:1857 Browser: 3875
It seems that the parody of the work currently serialized [ whether neta went out and ] by the same magazine has increased.
Don't が and such inside neta care for it?
It is unpleasant.
My moo is also a comet clearly.
It is disclosed and disclosed that it is the mere imitation of hiyoko, and it is 。.
It is really unpleasant.
it should be closed quickly -- wicked I thought that they were comics.

2006/11/08 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Rogi Provider: 39711 Host:39768 Browser: 6812
it is く -- it らないっちゃ and is trivial It will be as an aim if it says as an aim.
It will show, if it says that it shows.
They are something and such touch.
It is bad if it says that it is bad.
But it is a success supposing it is an aim from 最初っ about that.
Probably, it just called it the made good "coterie magazine." "It is common" is appropriate.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.