Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 3,928/in 4,212 titles (Total -5.00/Deviation 47.36) Rank 3,927 <= => Rank 3,929
Comics ranking of 2005: Rank 122/in 143 titles Rank 121 <= => Rank 123

Little detective trickstar Hoshi(Comics)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImages
Information about this title

Monthly Corocoro
SHOGAKUKAN

Released:2005 in Japan End:2008 in Japan
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageComicsRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanVery bad(-2.00)3,92847.36-5.001

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan3,07388
Outside Japan7300

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0101006
Percentage0.0%12.5%0.0%12.5%0.0%0.0%75.0%
Added percentage0%12.5%12.5%25%25%25%100%
Summary12.5%12.5%75%
                                                                                                   

Views for recent 8 days
Total109876543
19
3
1
5
1
2
0
2
5

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
All
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/09/29 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by SOLDS Provider: 2904 Host:2818 Browser: 8090
Skill of drawing and a story are completely useless!
Even if it calls it "full-scale mystery comics", し [ it has not become at all ]!
All deployment of a story is also shobo past る!
Constantly, it was comic, and although read from って聞いた by which inference comics like "the Kindaichi boy's cause-books" are serialized, the expectation was betrayed!
A comic has many latest severe works constantly!
The chief editor is also doing in how!

[Good point]
Completely nothing!

[Bad point]
do poor 糞な絵 to the extent that it cannot think that the 1:female cartoonist drew!
(Although the woman drew, there cannot be this [ no ]!) It is if it is the woman of elementary school upper classes.
The beautiful picture near a pro is drawn!
The comics which such a woman drew are the first!
2: The story of an incident is also useless!
(The deployment to incident solution is past [ shobo ] from "name detective Conan"!) In that a larcenist is a "dog" たり, it is very at about the same story as an amateur.
It is foolish!
3: There was a place which is 破錠(ing) halfway!
(Although there was also a setup which pursues large 怪盗 trickster in early stages, it becomes the talk of kuraudeia from the middle, and last round is greeted as it is, and it ends.) After all, was it in a large 怪盗 trickster's talk!?
)
[Comprehensive evaluation]
As inference comics, it is completely a disqualification level!
I want you to read and study not only the study of a picture but "the Kindaichi boy's cause-books", and an Edogawa random step and Conan Doyle's novel.

2008/06/15 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by TOBISHIMA Provider: 3831 Host:3888 Browser: 4184

[Good point]
It is good for a guide to a mystery.
A character is likable.

[Bad point]
Variation is in the level of 謎解き for every talk.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Although criticism concentration is carried out at the writing here, I do not criticize this work completely.
Although a draw lump, on the whole, thinks that it is a shallow work with it being sure, I can think that this is consideration of the reader who leads more simply 謎解き which tends to be complicated to a correct answer briefly.
Since readers are led by juvenile, I think that it is the style of こそ.
When a child is a reader, isn't the direction of a style like this work easy とっついてくれ?
since an important mystery also has me weak -- かもしれませ -- although -- if the mystery which has resistance to the teeth comparatively is also read and advanced, it is But it is although it is slightly tight that the balance of the level of 謎解き changes each time as stated orally.
It is as above-mentioned the work recommended to a mystery beginner.
Although it does not live up to the name as merely calling it "authenticity" just for a moment.
evaluation is very good -- coming out -- 。
2008/05/10 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 魔物 Provider: 40359 Host:40360 Browser: 4184
Since it seems to be interesting, it read at the secondhand bookseller.
Although exact evaluation cannot be performed since only a few is still read, I think that they are the comics which seem to be very much interesting.
Evaluation is a "normal."
2008/04/24 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 龍道 Provider: 4318 Host:4245 Browser: 7395
what to say -- you -- 仰ってくれてる's ...
evaluation -- complaint nothing -- the worst
2007/12/27 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Nappa Provider: 6043 Host:6045 Browser: 6287
What feeling do other inference cartoonists do?
It is too ugly.

2007/10/16 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Momon monnaa Provider: 19002 Host:19154 Browser: 5234
画力 is not drawing a too low door etc.
perfectly using ruler probably.
Does the tool use the pen?
After knowing the latest thing more, I want you to make neta that there is no information power in it too much (the game which can do such a comfortable play with one antenna in those without Wi-Fi-does not have hebunzudoa etc.).
The appearance of a game is too old..
けど whose inference neta is not great, either and which will therefore continue constantly well ...

2007/08/02 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 濁流の魔手 Provider: 18500 Host:18655 Browser: 4184
Useless.
Don't lick a mystery.
Be related with illustrating.
Out of the question.
It is dirty.
し [ it is too coarse ].
That coarseness is severe although the comics on the theme of a mystery have played the role with a fairly important picture.
The cover of 扉絵 (does it say?) or a book keeps up appearances vainly, and is emphasizing the shadow by high contrast.
It is already useless.
It is dirty.
Be related with a character.
An attractive character is not.
A hero's looks are dasa past る.
As for the hero, in the mystery, the impression had better do the looks which look to some extent intellectual.
the priest of 5 yen hage -- bare feet -- shoes -- the early stages of Showa -- seeing -- a necktie meaningless to the old-fashioned shirt and old-fashioned shorts -- a coat [ た / shorts ] It is what the world.
It has the special capability which does not understand the method of an enemy for whether it is helpful to what, either.
It withers.
On the whole, the design of kyara is not elaborate.
Characteristic and impressive kyara is not.
Overly fatal.
Be related with a story.
If a picture is coarse, an attractive thing by the story ......
It has not done.
it is what -- that 失笑 cannot be forbidden to a trick, such as a childish trick which cannot be put on the windward of a mystery, either, each time.
When where said so in "authenticity", a certain へぼ baseball comics also stated "authenticity." Is the word "authenticity" then in fashion, constantly?
First of all, is the "formal" meaning known?
It smiles bitterly involuntarily.
reading too as other men had said -- recommending -- た -- there is nothing Evaluation is the "worst."
2007/08/01 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 虚構の旅人 Provider: 19636 Host:19755 Browser: 6287
constantly -- coming out -- the inference comics under series Although written by explanation of this work, "a full-scale detective story", and the beginning, are they ぶっちゃけ and a crimson lie?
The trick and criminal whom what hineri does not have in childish story deployment, either.
Furthermore, a setup called genius in why or a hero.
Is it the composition which cannot be enjoyed at all?
Now, it is signboard defeat ...
Although it is the 2nd long piece now, do you finish and finish?
Furthermore, although kyara called Laing is kyara with the fortitude of 唯, even so, I think that it is severe.
In throwing three to the middle of darts simultaneously, with back turned to たり, it is free from hazure with roulette...
This is severe.
what is fortitude -- tsukkomi たく -- ます Although Mr.
爺 called a trickster is a setup called legendary large 怪盗, is surrounding subordinate of an ordinary man visible only to it being strong?
Furthermore, illustrating is also quite severe.
Although 画力, on the whole, thinks constantly that it is a low quite mashi level in comics (dorabeesu etc.
is peeped into) with it being sure, if it still compares with the comics of other printing papers ...
Now, doesn't it feel like reading too?
Although it thinks that illustrating is quite important in inference comics ...
If this work was comics full of gags, although it was still "the comics full of gags at which it cannot laugh" ...
Did he put in halfway gag and bought 失笑 on the way, by halves, ...
a reader does not laugh, either -- are ...
Synthetic evaluation is the "worst." Aren't these comics osusume(ed), either?

Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved