Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 4,029/in 4,212 titles (Total -9.00/Deviation 46.47) Rank 4,028 <= => Rank 4,030
Comics ranking of 2001: Rank 70/in 80 titles Rank 69 <= => Rank 71

Magician Square (Comics)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImages
Information about this title

Takeshi Okano
Weekly Boys Jump
SHUEISHA

Released:2001/35 in Japan End:2001/51 in Japan
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageComicsRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanBad(-1.50)4,02946.47-9.00 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan1,95166
Outside Japan21500

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0002031
Percentage0.0%0.0%0.0%33.3%0.0%50.0%16.7%
Added percentage0%0%0%33.3%33.3%83.3%100%
Summary0%33.3%66.7%
                                                                                                   

Views for recent 8 days
Total109876543
7
0
0
2
3
1
0
1
0

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/06/01 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 前田清貴 Provider: 20030 Host:19961 Browser: 3876
Well.
Although it was not even if taken, couldn't it see -- It is a battle with an incomprehensible selective examination, and kamiiyu and the fellow (this is a great abhorrence) who says with becoming in the second half, although it was still able to see as magic introduction comics directly the first half -- Abruptly, the end of route change and the last add the beauty girl character done suddenly to a friend, and are 終了って -- I think that well, a magic comics って boy magazine is not turned to primarily.
Does it seem that it was exposed of a lack [ the assembly of this author's story capability ] too even if it attached editorial supervision although possibly printing was still able to be barely continued if it was a magic technical magazine (first half) --?
First of all, upwards there are too many characters (and coldhearted) which are not likable, and they are not mon as which the story was also able to be regarded by unreasonable 苦茶.
First of all, Musashi and Claude construct a pair.
-- It is magic given although it is good.
-- With the thing which may not be a pair well Only what can be considered is (the necessity done in an honest pair was not felt and cut).
Is [ ?
] the author one with it better [ to have seen / naporeonzu or / and to also carry out pair's magician's study ]?
If you want to be completed by it and such magic comics (being a boy magazine moreover), it is fusion of laughter like a Maggie family, and magic!
It is although it thinks that the direction which took up saying rises -- Is evaluation the "worst"?
A candid and unreasonable route change affected provoking -- If it is printing with a magic technical magazine (editorial supervision good, of course and with the original author), although it may be a so so good 線い beam well --
2006/11/22 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Matsu Provider: 31457 Host:31750 Browser: 3846
It is especially not too bad.
BL stink carries out a little.
Although the first direction was still mashi, after it became battle deployment, did it become ugly?

2006/11/21 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by 爆音 Provider: 8677 Host:8625 Browser: 5234
there was a portion likable [, such as a pair of Claude and Musashi, ] -- carrying out -- that 画力 is improving from last time たり -- etc.
-- although it expected very well as long as as [ reading ] was read ....
since it becomes after battle deployment ...
[sweat] -- although it is mashi from pin Taro on the whole ...
the grade which "is very bad" well
2005/12/18 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 無線機 Provider: 2156 Host:1899 Browser: 4487
There is no opportunity to meet with two volumes, and even if about three year passes, a continuation is still read and it does not become precocious.
It is an one-volume stop.
They are the comics which became the cause to begin to read a jump.
Although it was not so interesting when thinking now.

2005/11/15 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Esupaa Provider: 8276 Host:8301 Browser: 3875
You separated from the pair.
Although it is Mr.
Okano who had constructed the pair with the ni work and the true warehouse teacher in the past, did this become a series in the first individual?
Since "At Lady" is serialized in the name of ら剛 which accepts it well, it is the 2nd time formally.
the past -- phantom extermination comics -- although it fished (と -- may I say?) and comics have been drawn -- 本作 -- magic comics the magician who will make Mr.
Malick the start if it is called magic -- a bunny -- since an eye is likely to go to Mr.
-, they are Mr.
Okano's last arcana "mufufuiya - n -- ってち which thinks ROCK ON [ sex appeal element" / a reader's heart ], and does a route by the relation [ 801 / Claude / of a beauty form attribute / きや, hero Musashi, and ] / ょ っ 待 obtaining -- it is .
What is it?
Did plan to have ROCK ON not only a male reader but a female reader's heart?
Although it could still read well the first half and was the talk of the magic which cannot be referred to as interesting, if countdown of the close becomes coming, it is to why or halfway battle deployment suddenly ...
Although it is being able to say also to gedoo serialized like after, it is a candid route change ...
In Mr.
Okano's all the past works, it is ワーsutossu privately.
While regrettable.
...
A teacher's darkness term is although it is the touch which began from pin Taro well ...
Even so, it is doing what Mr.
Okano and now.
In a business jump, a genre is not known well, and sprouts, and a true warehouse teacher is original 8 ているけど of erotic comics ...

Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved