Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

AllAnimeGameComicNovelDramaSp. effectJP movieMovieInfo:voice,game..ReviewersDiary
Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 3,871/in 4,112 titles (Total -6.00/Deviation 47.12) Rank 3,870 <= => Rank 3,872

Mamotte Shugogetten Retrouvailles(Comics)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImagesGoods
(Books)

Latest Books: 2004/12 ()Mamotte Shugogetten: Retrouvailles Vol. 5 (Mamotte Shugo Getten: Retrouvailles) (in Japane... $80
Books(4hit)
Sales/Latest
Rank:5939182
Paperback:Mamotte Shugogetten: Retrouvailles Vol. 1 (Mamotte Shugo Getten: Retrouvailles) (in Japane...

Tag:$90

Comic:Mamotte Shugogetten Retrouvailles Vol. 3 (Mamotte Shugo Getten) (in Japanese)
Tag:$30

Comic:Mamotte Shugogetten: Retrouvailles Vol. 4 (Mamotte Shugo Getten: Retrouvailles) (in Japane...

Tag:$80

Comic:Mamotte Shugogetten: Retrouvailles Vol. 5 (Mamotte Shugo Getten: Retrouvailles) (in Japane...

Tag:$80
2004/12
()
Information about this title

Minene Sakurano
COMIC BLADE Mag Garden Corporation

Official sites
1. MOMO FIVE (Translation)
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageComicsRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanBad(-1.20)3,87147.12-6.00 
Outside JapanGood(0.00)8741.480.00 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan9,53095
Outside Japan1,07011

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0002111
Percentage0.0%0.0%0.0%40.0%20.0%20.0%20.0%
Added percentage0%0%0%40%60%80%100%
Summary0%40.0%60%
                                                                                                    

Views for recent 8 days
Total87654321
6
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
0

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation New!
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
This reputation board


2005/05/28 Normal [Edit/Delete//Only this reviewer/Only this review/post sympathy comment/]
by TAKARAYA Review history[Good:78(58%) Normal:57(42%) Bad:0(0%)] / Provider: 34674 Host:34625 Browser: 3646
The passionate fans of these comics suspect that the ghostwriter is drawing these comics now.
Passionate fans suspect that, as for Chapter 3 or subsequent ones, the ghostwriter is drawing comics.
They also carried out handwriting analysis and compared a real author's case with a ghostwriter's case.
The passionate fan already knows the history and full name about the ghostwriter who is imitation.
Consequently, they are sure that the ghostwriter is drawing these comics now.
But, the author and publishing company of these comics are not commented at all about this affair.
By the reason for saying so, doubt is deepening further.
"Mamotte Syugogetten" was a wonderful comic.
However, after the author was frustrated, it lost charm.
The situation which became worse could be improved, when the ghostwriter of imitation is dismissed and Minene Sakurano which is an actual author draws these comics.
Many fans think so.
This cartoon ended at last.
The truth was indistinct to the last minute.
It is regrettable.
Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/02/19 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 三八式ほへーじゅー Provider: 10727 Host:11050 Browser: 6520

[Good point]
Although the touch was different, it thought that that was fairly nice at that.

[Bad point]
Moreover the story is inferior to the previous work, a leader behind the scenes also has a pain in the author.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Illustrating is [ whether since skillful い is thought very much, it says a part to read as a work different from a previous work, and ]...
To me, it is impossible and the bottom Although he likes the kirryuu of the touch here better than kirryuu of a previous work individually, revival by the original author is desired.

2005/08/06 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Seseragi Provider: 12661 Host:12599 Browser: 2755(Mobile)
The trash exceeding a previous work.
The worst was passed and it was amazed.

2005/07/19 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by Esupaa Provider: 8276 Host:8301 Browser: 4184
although it was also as the last talk, and it stood and the last volume was read ...
what -- that [!!
] it is useless ...
it is too useless ...
the に which is not confessed to shao -- an end -- !?
It can close clearly, is っぽかった and is sushi ..
It is ...
suddenly [ why ].
It is maji for which I feel that the stock of a braid has fallen recently something.
I want to count on 次回作.
Of course, illustrating is a teacher only in 本当.
It is having become what つ or now.
there are many things which disgraced past Eisaku like this -- recently The recollections at the time of the-less mark were broken.

2005/06/19 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Gurimu Provider: 465 Host:523 Browser: 4925
It is this coterie magazine.
Are you amateur?
The-less mark version is well 良しと(ed), although many things are called pakuri of woman God.
being べたな -- since quality of image was good aside from a lack [ the significance of existence of た and a spirit of a departed person ] But is this too severe?
Or [ that what was necessary was not to make it comics, but to make it the novel version, and just to have made it the character when taking this out ].
Since the character was not disagreeable.

2005/03/24 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by 宝家義頼 Provider: 46956 Host:46958 Browser: 3646
According to the information, they are "ま, with protection 月天!
Seemingly, re-逢" will carry out a series end in the comic braid May, 2005 issue (March 30 sale).
Although I do not subscribe to the comic braid and the schedule does not exist, either, it is worrisome in what how to finish is adopted.
If a book is put on the market, although it may read .............
for a fan -- the last talk -- the original author -- he draws exactly -- a problem -- it will be -- surely .
me -- the original author -- "ま, with protection 月天 at the time of his having drawn exactly since he liked ", it not being satisfactory -- a way -- I do not want you .

2004/12/11 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by Esupaa Provider: 34857 Host:34861 Browser: 3875
Has the work with which the teacher is written only in the genuine article in the special number number neighborhood recently appeared?
Those days, (it is ssu when serialized by cancer cancer), it was the completely different touch.

2004/08/21 Comment(normal) [Original Japanese review]
by K Sato Provider: 23106 Host:22853 Browser: 5173
Although it has not noticed at all if not pointed out, has it changed to be sure?
Since it thinks that it became the talk which is not known well [ something ] and has not seen yet after one volume after becoming "re-逢", it cannot say not at all any more.

2004/08/18 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Esupaa Provider: 37741 Host:37751 Browser: 3875
Or [ that this was also added at last ] ...
The work drawn by the leader behind the scenes although what was necessary was just to have stopped and solved by the previous work.
In a word, it is called the "member version protection 月天" and a colander is not obtained.
The pattern, the story, etc.
are far inferior to the previous work.
since it is prohibition here, it excludes rather telling [ leader behind the scenes / this ] about the author (the site which Mr.
宝家義頼 introduced in detail -- reference) Although advanced by a leader's behind the scenes hand every now and then by the present four-volume sale ...
即打ち切り is desired (since it is a braid, it will be impossible ...
only since the previous work was good, the person who had expectation betrayed is also needed ...
[ since ]).
Evaluation is allowed to suppose "It is bad" for the moment.

2004/08/18 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 宝家義頼 Provider: 38641 Host:38458 Browser: 3646
If the 1st volume of a book is read, although a difference too clear to the pattern from the 1st talk to the 3rd talk and the pattern after it will be seen ...........
It is regrettable to have deteriorated in what has not only a pattern but somehow cheap story composition.
Since the truth is not told to けど and the formula which will be what is depended on "the author's convenience", this has deepened doubt.
Introduction of the site where it was told about consideration of the neighborhood why the style deteriorated on the way ("ま, with protection 月天 of animation!) It is the sake of a sense although the evaluation column of " was also introduced.
↓ http://caveyojide.hp.infoseek.co.jp/sakurano.html "ま carried by the latest "comic braid", with protection 月天 re-逢" is read after a long time, and after garatt and a style deteriorate after the 4th talk, the pattern with sense of incongruity is making progress from the front -- " それっぽく " Although it thought that it was visible させ [ comparison of the pattern of shaorin with which the cover of the comic braid first issue was decorated too, and the pattern of shaorin currently now serialized by the present comic braid / feel / inferiority / the pattern of shaorin under series / now ] Do "easy" and "dignity" drift [ the direction of an once pattern ] to the pattern ....................
A counterfeit is a counterfeit and a genuine article is a genuine article too..............
It does not seem to be easy to bury this difference.
I want a genuine article to make a comeback early.
The author is this work.
" It threw away.
" Since it seemingly is not a translation ........................

Post your review / Top pageALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved