Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews 		Others
Site map
Search / Outside DB:
Comics ranking: Rank 2,698/in 4,168 titles (Total 0.99/Deviation 48.69) Rank 2,697 <= => Rank 2,699
Comics ranking of 1997: Rank 41/in 58 titles Rank 40 <= => Rank 42

Merry Wind(Comics)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)		ForumImagesGoods
(Books)
Latest Books: 2008/06/29 ():A Tale Of The Winds And The Waves: A Mournful Chant Of Merry Christmas (1849) $95
Books(19hit)
Sales/Latest		VHS(1hit)
Sales/Latest		Music(35hit)
Sales/Latest		Toys(3hit)
Sales/Latest
Rank:3201277
Unknown Binding:The merry wind

1967
()		 Rank:5330427
Unknown Binding:The wind that wouldn't blow;: Stories of the merry Middle Kingdom for children, and myself...
1927
()		 Rank:5609634
Hardcover:The Wind That Wouldn't Blow: Stories of the Merry Middle Kingdom for Children, and Myself
1927
()		 Rank:6595475
Hardcover:Air Wind and Flight (Junior Science)
Tag:$95
1982/07
()		 Rank:6723333
Paperback:Cakes...Cakes...and More Cakes (Recipes from Merry Wind, Vol 1)
Tag:$00
1991/12
()
Hardcover:The Wind That Wouldn't Blow Stories of the Merry M
1927
()
Hardcover:The wind that wouldn't blow;: Stories of the merry Middle Kingdom for children, and myself...
1928/01/01
()
VHS Tape:disney's sing along songs /christmas pack 10 : Disney Sing Along Songs: Hunchback / Topsy ...
 Rank:35383
DVD Audio:Film Busters

Tag:$98
2002/09/24
()
Eval.:*****
1.Musical Utopia for Movie Lovers		 Rank:67263
Toy:WIND-UP WALKING NOSE
Information about this title

Junji Yamamoto
Weekly Boys Jump
SHUEISHA

Released:1997 in Japan
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageComicsRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanGood(0.33)2,69848.690.99 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan64133
Outside Japan13500

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People0101100
Percentage0.0%33.3%0.0%33.3%33.3%0.0%0.0%
Added percentage0%33.3%33.3%66.6%99.9%99.9%100%
Summary33.3%33.3%33.3%
                                                                                                   

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation New!
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)		Normal
(Only Evaluation)		Bad
(Only Evaluation)		All
(Only Evaluation)		None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)		Normal
(Only Evaluation)		 Bad
(Only Evaluation)		All
(Only Evaluation)		None
This reputation board

Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.
2007/03/03 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 8396 Host:8622 Browser: 5237
Although he bought it with Furumoto before for about three years, I wanted to have not made it the close individually but to see by the thing not a several pages baseball scene but over a long period of time.
し he also likes a picture individually -- also talking -- し it thought that it was good although fantasy editing edited by the extra usually came out and being carried out -- a love -- rice -- talking -- it is individually favorite
2006/09/20 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Rogi Provider: 52685 Host:52819 Browser: 6812
It is going to do "touch and just called it big-failure." There is no comment beyond it.
After all, they are omaaju and pakuri about a favorite work....
Although a way of speaking is good anyhow, there is also such a thing [ getting and large-hitting very well ].
"The flame of degradation." But such a fortune did not visit to this.
Regrettable.
However, each story was by no means bad, and its character setup was also good.
especially -- a female supervisor -- after that -- "-- おお -- し it was neta which it hears and which had raised high and was used also for " After all, it is lack of ability.
Evaluation is "bad."
2006/09/20 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 夙夜健 Provider: 18384 Host:18446 Browser: 6287
It is a private very regrettable work.
Picture -> Although "bad [ ]" composition etc.
is good, it is regrettable that it is not what a person's expression etc.
can regard as superficial and nice.
My direction which lost the gyagu っぽい portion and devoted it seriously like the story is liking.
Story -> Although it is common contents that the rival of the junior high school days of the hero who usually aims at" Koshien has died, what is easy to read an introductory part etc.
is good.
however -- all -- two volumes -- one real game (game which the hero gave up) と -- saying "It is bad.
" Near "-- usually -- " it is .
Characters -> Although a "good [ ]" hero and the heroine are common setup, since it is likable, it is good.
The thing made to regard as wanting to see after that [ this / of two persons ] was felt, so that the end was regrettable at two volumes.
By synthesis "It is bad.
" It is near.
It is usually ".
It carries out.
Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.

Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved