Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 2,096/in 4,169 titles (Total 2.00/Deviation 48.91) Rank 2,095 <= => Rank 2,097

Raka Ryusui(Comics)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Houbunsha

Official sites
1. http://ikki0harvestmoon.web.fc2.com/index.html (Translation)

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	ComicsRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(1.00)	2,096	48.91	2.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	438	2	2
Outside Japan	43	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/07/27 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Chestnut Review history[Good:1(100%) Normal:0(0%) Bad:0(0%)] / Provider: 9086 Host:9176 Browser: 11644
falling of blossoms -- running water -- the first volume was read A work with the pretty picture of a character.
Are they not "four tops of kyudo part neta" but "four tops for which a kyudo member's girls come out" in contents?
The contents of a scenario and impact are thin.
Although it thinks that introduction development turn and conclusion of four tops are made, it is deficient in merihari.
Touch called honワka thing work made into dara っ although it is a four-frame strip cartoon.
Or [ not being suitable for those who ask for simple fun by the four-frame strip cartoon ].

[Comprehensive evaluation]
With ほん, although impact is weak, it presupposes "It is good" for the time being.

2006/07/17 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 十兵衛改 Provider: 8004 Host:7863 Browser: 3875
New comics dealing with kyudo.
However, it is although it seldom seems have employed efficiently yet...
There are few characters like the rest with four tops of a ゆる system.
Although まぁ and it are good, since the individuality of the kyara is a quite satisfactory weak eye, it will feel thing insufficient in any way.
Also or [ the work which will transform itself if kyara comes to riot with ikiiki ].

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.