Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 2,955/in 4,168 titles (Total 0.00/Deviation 48.47) Rank 2,954 <= => Rank 2,956
Comics ranking of 2007: Rank 76/in 120 titles Rank 75 <= => Rank 77

Suzumiya haruhi chan no yuuutu(Comics)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Nagaru Tanigawa Monthly Boys Ace

Released:2007/07/26 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	ComicsRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(0.00)	2,955	48.47	0.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	1,277	2	2
Outside Japan	17	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

50%

100%

Summary

50%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13
9 0 1 0 0 1 1 6 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/06/13 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 埋み火 Provider: 51291 Host:51358 Browser: 6395
It was fairly interesting although one volume was read.
Than expected.
Although haruhi knew only animation and one original, it was satisfactory in neta.
Of course, haruhi is not osusume(ed) in the direction which is not known at all.
Is a picture seldom those[ with skillful く ]-ま(ed)?
I think that it is the passing mark as comics full of gags.
Kana - also with unavoidable also being called a coterie magazine level if skill of drawing is very inferior to the author of ちゅる or さん at all.
good at a picture, although it is individual comment -- it is -- seldom not caring for this picture before the lower part たり Although a deformation picture is not said yet, I feel that the picture of a normal has shifted from the image of haruhi considerably.
Since the uncanny picture which exists a feeling of a physical disorder has jumped into the cover 捲った moment.
If it makes a selling point of a brand called haruhi at all, do I want you to choose the person near an original picture?
It is not the problem of skill of drawing.
To っていう's which is in a world I think well that the author's characteristic of it is lost and it is are in it.
Although these comics are realized in the combination of the comics of four tops and a normal ...
The comics of a normal are not good although it was able to laugh at four tops very well.
at any rate -- all なら -- I wanted you to make it four top And some haruhi are uzai.
uzai was not thought so much at the time of animation saw - [ although ] kyon is poor.
It was able to laugh and is satisfactory rather than it thought that it was individual.
Especially neta related to Nagato was good.
It is not the level which can merely laugh heartily.

2008/06/04 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by ゆかり御飯 Provider: 18003 Host:17895 Browser: 2144
Gloomily [ the comics version Suzumiya haruhi ] similarly, it fishes with a cover and they are the comics of a coterie magazine level of gakkari from contents.
....
Or [ that it is impolite to a member writer ].
If there is no skill of drawing, I will think the kana for which you must not depend on a deformation character more.
neta is -- 8s ぱ improper ぎみ not too bad.
To the extent that former neta is known and it is called niyari at last.
Since it does not necessarily come by vigor to take laughter, it does not recommend to those who do not know an original.
The future improvement in skill of drawing and a future gag sense rise are expected.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.