Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 869/in 4,212 titles (Total 7.00/Deviation 50.01) Rank 868 <= => Rank 870
Comics ranking of 1988: Rank 14/in 44 titles Rank 13 <= => Rank 15

Uchuu eiyuu monogatari(Comics)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumImages
Information about this title

Takehiko Ito Ultra Jump SHUEISHA

Released:1988 in Japan End:1992 in Japan
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageComicsRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanGood(1.40)86950.017.00 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan2,27965
Outside Japan28200

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People3001010
Percentage60.0%0.0%0.0%20.0%0.0%20.0%0.0%
Added percentage60%60%60%80%80%100%100%
Summary60%20.0%20%
                                                                                                    

Views for recent 8 days
Total109876543
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/02/26 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 十傑集 Provider: 11009 Host:11078 Browser: 5234
Should it be called an outrider of the hodgepodge work of various elements, such as "SF battle", "magic", and "school fuss gag"?
Therefore, is what tastes tend to part from clear?
Was my school monochrome-story at the time of one part better?
Even if it goes into two parts, it reads for the time being and better た has not memorized most last directions.
or it became impossible to follow the author's laver -- since there was gotagota of a printing magazine etc.
but, it does not generally は言えま Evaluation is "common."
2004/09/29 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Katoru Provider: 17395 Host:17456 Browser: 5234
Although it is comics, there are no comics with such an annoying impression like this in others.
A picture is also saved, and since it is poor the degree [ like ] which is not, it never sees semipermanently.

2004/05/24 Comment(good) [Original Japanese review]
by レインボー猫 Provider: 40569 Host:40530 Browser: 4960
it is the work which it can estimate "is good" just because it was now and collected and read to the last -- be fastidious It abhorred really at the beginning of a series.
However, it became really interesting after going into part II.
...
The gag of the not much transparent parody aim is making it only shirake too.
now, remembering just for a moment can also remember that size neta of Captain Future, a magician sari, and the account of 獣王 (game of Sega) something was contained ....
since "foolish laver" is in foundations, although it is a liver whether that can be allowed or not -- as oneself -- the adventure of the serious flavor of the second half -- does he like a fighting scene portion?
The true fun of this work greets part II, and considers [ being just going to dash towards the last, and ] it.
Although a parody element cannot be declared that there is nothing about confrontation with ま and rasubosu, it still OKs by "it burns."'s while firing "it burns" at the time of a start -- ぜんぜん -- since there was no portion said right [ that ] really noisily -- a love -- since there were rice and no gag (one's sensitivity) -- the beginning It is favorite the second half.
true .

2004/05/23 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 凰牙 Provider: 15144 Host:15026 Browser: 3875
kana -- which obtains and unearths a work with this nostalgic bulletin board with ~ ん and what -- honestly it is too glad Although it got by chance at the secondhand bookseller and being read at a stretch, he was able to be enjoyed very well.
Did it become serious suddenly in the first light laver to the last talk, and is there any wave?
This one is liked better than the latest comics several steps.

2004/05/23 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by レインボー猫 Provider: 40569 Host:40530 Browser: 4960
"-- the work with which all "ikioi are located in the middle of " with the laver of old good time" the beginning when the series started in comic konpu -- clearly -- saying -- the Talk with which it goes ahead only by ikioi It was alike and was not able to follow just for a moment.
It will be having not been used to such a style (there having been nothing not much those days).
Since there was such an idea of saying "it has made a mistake in the parody work as a work" and "a wrong way is second-class after all", "a parody element has" the work itself, and wasn't the look carried out, either?
He is Classic SF.
Captain Future Since it was a の fan, rejection came out only by a design looking at "fuoochunaa" (design of まんま of comet 号そ) of pakuri completely.
Although it was satisfactory since he was enjoyed in the view "an ant also says so" when it was present, it only passed and read at the time of a series start.
Only by するing noisily each time, it does not understand wanting what to really show in the least.
a love -- it is not rice, either and is not an action thing, either gag -- うす et al.
-- cold -- it carries out and is hard to accept a setup I think that it had not ridden on the time.
however, I can think that they say that the backer was hearing by "the writer (kyaradeza -- coming out) with an actual result" It is a cross just before going to part II that the real value of this work is demonstrated.
It is from VS principal's moment.
Till then, it is a free fuss and most story-hints are not stretched.
Those who know the original of Captain Future are the grades made into "niyari" by fuss as "niyari." However, the "originality" and the "work world" of this work begin from the place left for another solar system to the different world.
After moving to part II, a hot blood adventure fighting scene starts.
It bears to there.
The rest is with ikioi.
It is in the middle of a series, and the Kadokawa family feud broke out, and although the space hero tale which failed to move out required time until it was gathered by Shueisha (is it because Kadokawa was stubbornly sticky?), the last talk was able to be greeted somehow.
the adventure fighting scene which the author drew after part II, and a frame frame -- the exciting world can fully be demonstrated, and it is running it consistently to the last But the first laver of ikioi is the same from the beginning to the last.
It may be the work widely received just because it is now.
How which resistance twists in Mr.
after Ito's picture, and a single reading are recommended as laver with ikioi the direction which an adventure fighting scene likes.

2004/05/09 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 美代子 Provider: 19261 Host:19077 Browser: 4925
A favorite 護堂 cross of burn aims at the universe in a grandfather's inheritance and spacecraft fuoochunaa number!
Though it was Takehiko Ito's first series work, didn't you attach thoroughly and become precocious?
after -- to a slight degree -- と -- the place to say -- the inside of an editorial department -- gotagota -- it is -- a series -- or [ indefinite postponement and the regular animation ] -- going out and the state to which the magazine itself is discontinued soon Revival also costs two years and a half as a result, and it completes by total of eight volumes in the other company.
-- The contents (bitter smile) with which the work which was unfortunate individual so far has not met in advance behind are already the highest!
The hint is everywhere spread around, and even if tempo is also speedy and it finishes reading it to the last, "I can wish to read from the beginning again and to confirm all hints." This work is also recommended if it is those who have read the "outlaw star" of the same Ito 岳彦作.
Since, as for these two works, the "dream" is connected in the theme.

Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved