Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 1,844/in 4,168 titles (Total 2.00/Deviation 48.92) Rank 1,843 <= => Rank 1,845
Comics ranking of 1987: Rank 22/in 41 titles Rank 21 <= => Rank 23

Yami no Kao(Comics)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Mitsuteru Yokoyama
Futabasya Koudansha
Weekly Boys Jump
WEEKLY PLAYBOY

Released:1987/11/24 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	ComicsRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(2.00)	1,844	48.92	2.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	102	1	1
Outside Japan	6	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/03/12 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Katoru Provider: 4749 Host:4768 Browser: 5234
Although not carried out by being a talk especially of how, as what Mr.
Yokoyama 光輝 drew, it is new, and they are the comics carried by the non-boy magazine.
The previously published book was carried out at last, or it is this series.
-- (-_-).
Seemingly it is K1.
Although the history of the image ■ sport combative of ■ falsehood was not known well, was there any thing from ancient times?
The reverse-side side of changes with a hero more private than a game or a performance was the center of the talk.
■ Although the dragon of a knife and the expectation of sharp-eared 伝吉 involving gold graveyard ■ treasure talked interesting, as for the female president, even the necessity of boarding had only the role with a passive hero.
■ illegal face ■ -- the novel used as the motif of this also disguising itself as the Ota black aside from what a teacher and the scene for which it uses having become white hair unlike it although caricatured do not have, and not being disclosed -- how much -- it is also --

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.