Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 3,766/in 4,217 titles (Total -2.01/Deviation 48.02) Rank 3,765 <= => Rank 3,767

Zen Nihon Imouto Senshuken(Comics)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Information about this title

Shigeru Doutaka
Young Magazine Uppers
Koudansha

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	ComicsRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Bad(-0.67)	3,766	48.02	-2.01

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	776	3	3
Outside Japan	52	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

33.3%

0.0%

33.3%

Added percentage

33.3%

66.6%

66.6%

100%

Summary

33.3%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8
4 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2006/09/19 Good [Original Japanese review]
by mizunasi Provider: 31396 Host:31651 Browser: 4665
They are the nerd comics for the nerds who enjoy a lot of neta [ truly ] which understands only the malice and nerd to a nerd for contents, sprouting and camouflaging appearance in a picture and a title [ kyachi ].
systematic -- "-- although it thinks that it cuts and is alike and per [ reconstruction" ] is resembled, it was a youth magazine series, and it is drawn here still just as it likes [ the author ], and it is interesting A malice-side is one of osusume in those who want to read "reconstruction" nerd comics although it is 2ch level (there is also much neta which says or was gathered from 2ch(es)) and saying so does not be suitable and become precocious to a disagreeable person.

2006/06/26 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by 十兵衛改 Provider: 20883 Host:20912 Browser: 3875
Although often compared with certain adolescence currently serialized by yanmaga, this one was able to be enjoyed individually.
Although not understanding well by the considerable maniac also had neta of the kana ?
talk plentifully since it was specializing in gag, it was interesting more than it expected.
however -- too -- on the way -- since -- it will be what that the necessity of being a "younger sister" became thin how -- or [ the work which the admiration which rode on the younger sister boom easily cannot deny ]

2006/06/23 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 20897 Host:20818 Browser: 5234
Also often and bad the style of second half -of 90 s 21 century Kodansha is likely to be symbolized, and it is said that the world of a rori receptacle, 萌, a system component, etc.
is reproduced by the youth magazine.
But there was no favorable impression in the style of 本作 not much, and it begins to feel, and compared with Shogakukan or Shueisha, although it is Kodansha where an erotic degree and an erotic ratio are high, the man ......
to which it is expressed with the latest youth and the form with strange image and fall of a woman the tendency which runs to such works and which could not be attached could also tell this laver that it was by no means few.
Probably, there is that whose tendency for which neither Kodansha nor a magazine has neta fairly also from it being candid on the contrary if it runs to an eroticism too much so far even though it was the condition of the pink work of a brains direct hit, and there being no very interesting mood, and this work having continued considerably, and it depends on the existing work was very strong.
Although the work of the present Kodansha series has many works of such a style besides 本作, it is wrong that the hobby sticks out too far mostly in the strange place, or it is hard to say it also to a compliment as a legible work at such a point.
Although the resistance to 本作 became strong, having run in the too much strange direction although it was not 凡作, either did, Kodansha seemed to have proved the strength of the tendency which runs to an eroticism and 萌 too much although it is a style for otakkii, and the pattern was not bad, it was clear that it is the style which gennari.
Doesn't the work which Kodansha separated from 萌 and the eroticism have 創れ now?

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.