Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Comics ranking: Rank 2,813/in 4,185 titles (Total 0.00/Deviation 48.46) Rank 2,812 <= => Rank 2,814
Comics ranking of 1994: Rank 41/in 55 titles Rank 40 <= => Rank 42

RASH(Comics)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Diary
2006/01/12

Images

Goods
(Books)

Latest Books: 2008/10/07 ():

Serena: A Novel $95

Books(454hit) Sales/Latest					DVD(37hit) Sales/Latest	VHS(24hit) Sales/Latest	Music(32hit) Sales/Latest	VideoGames(26hit) Sales/Latest	Toys(4hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:30016 Hardcover:Serena: A Novel Tag:$95 2008/10/07 () Eval.:***** 1.Violent, Bold, and Complex	Rank:30369 Paperback:Rash Tag:$99 2007/12/04 () Eval.:***** 1.A Football Book in Dystopian Wrapping	Rank:80773 Paperback:Saints at the River: A Novel Tag:$00 2005/06/16 () Eval.:***** 1.NOT AS GOOD AS I HAD HOPED	Rank:117157 Paperback:The Natural Man Tag:$95 2008/08/05 ()	Rank:129649 Hardcover:Agent A To Agent Z Tag:$95 2004/02/01 () Eval.:***** 1.60's Era Espionage for the Kiddles	Rank:622 Can't Buy Me Love Tag:$99 2002/08/13 () Eval.:***** 1.Cindy Mancini, where have you gone?!	Rank:2710 VHS Tape:Can't Buy Me Love Tag:$99 2002/08/13 () Eval.:***** 1.Cindy Mancini, where have you gone?!	Rank:28632 Audio CD:Divine Light: Reconstructions & Mix Translation - Bill Laswell Tag:$98 2001/07/31 () Eval.:***** 1.Destined to Live Forever...	Rank:3027 Video Game:Road Rash Jailbreak Eval.:***** 1.WHY ROAD RASH?! WHY?! 4.5 OUT OF 10	Rank:7480 Toy:Rash or Zitz Battletoads Bendems (1991) Sold Individually

Information about this title

Tsukasa Houjo
Weekly Boys Jump
SHUEISHA

Released:1994 in Japan End:1995 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	ComicsRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Good(0.00)	2,813	48.46	0.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	1,087	3	2
Outside Japan	197	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

50.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

50%

100%

Summary

50%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 6 5 4 3 2 1 31 30
3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/07/22 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 十傑集 Provider: 5925 Host:5698 Browser: 8593
After a long-term hit tends to be caught by the style which has solidified there.
Mr.
Hojo was not an exception, either.
The hero was not visible to the character which is a type near the scent of the "city hunter" who moves by feeling or intuition, and is useful with the occupation of honesty and a doctor.
Although you may be a scent type externally, if it is with necessity like Saeko, it seems to be useless with it not being a character with second page nature with the portion which can become cool-headed, or the portion which had a steadfast theory like "the woman of department 研." The story itself inclined toward 情 too much from 理, and a professional charm was not felt.
If applied in early stages of the "city hunter" from the "cat's-eye", although this neighborhood was able to be balanced, the admiration from which there is also a request of an editorial department and the style has changed cannot be denied.
It will deal with the homely work whether the author was also aware of it by this work from now on ...

2008/07/22 Good [Original Japanese review]
by 鯖鯖 Provider: 44994 Host:44884 Browser: 6342
"Cats -" or subsequent ones Although it is the work of the favorite writer who continues reading, it is as it is continuing standing a hit.
Thing kana whose viewpoint was severe.
It is considered.
Although it was rather interesting It is the close by shortness called a total of two volumes.
With 刑務医 Hero who is involved in an incident It is adored by everybody although a trouble is caused in character which broke the bamboo with the 勇希は破 weather.
It is looking and is likable.
(although there is a close resemblance between the scent of "city -", and short hair from character) It left.
With short supan of two volumes Is carrying out the portrait carefully, such as a hero's past, a true author?
Evaluation is "good." It is the work which wanted to read the point more.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.