Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Movie ranking: Rank 246/in 1,463 titles (Total 10.00/Deviation 50.74) Rank 245 <= => Rank 247
Movie ranking of 1984: Rank 4/in 14 titles Rank 3 <= => Rank 5

2010(Movie)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Diary
2008/08/16

Images

Goods
(DVD)

Latest DVD: 2008/02/19 ():

Zebraman $99

DVD(20hit) Sales/Latest					VHS(20hit) Sales/Latest	Books(2619hit) Sales/Latest	Music(172hit) Sales/Latest	VideoGames(6hit) Sales/Latest	Toys(64hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:528 Blu-ray:2001 - A Space Odyssey [Blu-ray] Tag:$99 2007/10/23 () Eval.:***** 1.PERFECT! As good as it gets and then some	Rank:1423 2001 - A Space Odyssey (Two-Disc Special Edition) Tag:$98 2007/10/23 () Eval.:***** 1.PERFECT! As good as it gets and then some	Rank:6124 2010: The Year We Make Contact Tag:$98 2000/09/19 () Eval.:***** 1.Superb follow-up to the first	Rank:18964 Snakes on a Plane (Full Screen Edition) Tag:$98 2007/01/02 () Eval.:***** 1.Snakes on a Plane!!??!!	Rank:22653 Walt Disney Treasures - Silly Symphonies Tag:$99 2001/12/04 () Eval.:***** 1.Disc 1 Might Not Work!!	Rank:2887 VHS Tape:Life With Mikey Tag:$99 1994/07/29 () Eval.:***** 1.Enjoyable comedy	Rank:4095 Spiral-bound:Patient Care Skills (5th Edition) (PATIENT CARE SKILLS ( MINOR)) Tag:$60 2005/09/12 () Eval.:***** 1.Patient Care Skills	Rank:40573 Audio CD:Now That's What I Call Music! 9 Tag:$98 2002/03/19 () Eval.:***** 1.LOVE IT	Rank:97 Video Game:Nintendo DS/DS Lite Action Replay Tag:$99 2006/09/01 () Eval.:***** 1.Bad customer service.	Rank:1202 Toy:Solar Energy Tag:$99 2006/06/12 ()

Information about this title

Peter Hyams
Sir Arthur Charles Clarke
Richard Edlund
Roy Scheider John Lithgow
Dame Helen Mirren
TV Asahi
Michio Hazama Katsunosuke Hori Kazuko Yanaga Kei Tomiyama Yoshisada Sakaguchi Gara Takasima Mitsuo Senda

Released:1984 in Japan

Image gallery sites
1. http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~ys9m-ymgt/1985/1985-069.html

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	MovieRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Best(2.50)	246	50.74	10.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	2,147	4	4
Outside Japan	432	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

50.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

50%

100%

Summary

100%

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2006/12/22 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by HUNGRY SPIDER Review history[Good:2(40%) Normal:1(20%) Bad:2(40%)] / Provider: 5029 Host:4901 Browser: 7395
It seems that the SF film which is proud of unparalleled of-art completeness (felt as the "electric wave" when saying bad), and 本作 positioned in the sequel of "2001: A Space Odyssey" have won popularity from the intelligibility.
To be sure, the view of the world is intelligible.
In "2001", since it talks with a rich expression well so that I do by being solved and characters cannot think the sequel of that work, although the "mystery" currently gradated is not perfect, familiarity is also felt.
However, it is not like [ which should be especially mentioned if the meaning of since a previous work is a previous work is also included with unwillingness and this is ordinarily seen as a single article ].
Moreover, the previous work brewed the strike ishizumu, therefore a wonderful feeling of air, and had completed the world which can think that reappearance is impossible.
If it is caught with the good, it is also possible to blame for the polite human depiction in 本作 to have killed the peculiarity of 折角, and to have made it into ordinary SF entertainment.
Although an idea probably changes with people, since this neighborhood felt both as itself, it is a very complicated thought.
Although it was only subjectivity, this work also received the impression which is running loading without the goal like "2001." that is, having finished, not solving a fundamental portion at all (or the intention which shows a clear answer in a maker side -- there being nothing), but receiving an interpretation like a previous work, and leaving a hand, even if it became intelligible externally -- if -- I was able to consider -- it divides and comes out some monochrome squirrels of the relation between the object which flew to ape-man resemblance cost, and a monochrome squirrel are how after all -- the moon's surface -- the embryo who went into the capsule who Davis by whom eroupa is really reflected [ what the upper object means and ] in an eye was -- who -- or [ being persistent ] -- I am sorry (smile) Well, also in 本作, many "mysteries" also including a link with a previous work remains in this way.
When the mystery is able to be felt, it can be said that the goal is born to loading of 本作 according to how to concern us.
本作 shows just no "clear" replies.
However, it has fully left only the room between which our thinking is made to be placed.
When the last announcement of Hull and the narration of the last flow and it rushes into a roll, a game with 本作 too much difficult for solving a theme by one word of "peace" starts.
Since it may be childish even if forcing, all the occurrences in 本作 and many mysteries of having been involved in it are applied to "something", and meditation will be plotted if I will arrive for "what place being" by it.
This will be the very high-quality intellectual game compared also with philosophy with another name with "learning without the end", if it investigates thoroughly.
I can think that the place which 本作 aimed at will be 其処.
A place [ he greatly likes this technique (there are few examples of a success unusually) of receiving by not setting up the goal and shaking the intellectual curiosity of a hand ].
Although many things have been written above, it seems to be in 本作 about how to enjoy a large number.
It is fun to also make it link with a previous work bad also as SF entertainment.
Probably, it will also be good to be able to feel the theme "question [ to machine civilization ]" Becoming, even if it sets Hull on the leading role, and to consider the view of the world of the whole 本作 as above-mentioned.
Although the way of enjoying oneself thought of was mentioned briefly, it original besides this will surely exist.
When 本作 is very (he was visible to ordinary SF apparently) broad and is an understanding work, it is made to realize it in the meaning.
Although molding is inferior compared with the previous work, completeness to the extent that it is wiped away is felt sure.
The evaluation to such 本作 is very difficult.
It is because how to be visible is completely different in the case where only a story is followed simply, and the case where it thinks to a slight degree from there.
However, I regard as deepness of a work what here, "how to be visible is [ a thing ] different" in the affirmative, and think that evaluation can settle in "it is very good." Probably, the "highest" was attached without hesitation, when interesting [ now / obediently ] and realizable, although it was this evaluation since simple fun was unsatisfactory.

2004/12/10 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 古典主義 Provider: 26326 Host:26232 Browser: 5234
The work which was successful as the first class SF also by sense obuワndaa also as amusement while 2001 was too difficult.
since relation is thin in the existence of the rebellion of HAL and a monochrome squirrel itself but so that tediously -- this work -- the point -- only setting -- it is rather unclear Although it thinks it the right deployment that HAL contacts the intention of a monochrome squirrel, exceeds the limit as a machine, and transcends self-inconsistency in fact ...
Even if there is a fine fault, the distinguished services in which amusement, impression, and acquittal of 2001 were attained are large.
The further height is reached because 2010 makes a prologue 2001 which passes also over a simple substance crabbedly but more than a standard and two works carry out a korabo rate.

2004/12/09 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by スペ9 Provider: 19247 Host:19009 Browser: 5623
Whether it would be made for description of a too difficult previous work, and 本作 which can be considered.
the work with a previous work great now truly which grew up from the previous work "2001" those days [ open ] although it was a good impression When having dared say, 本作 just said, "It is Ryosaku with common structure." Although the previous work has drawn simultaneously the advanced theme "human beings' progress" and "a rebellion of a computer", therefore although it was difficult, 本作 is easily drawn in a screen by performance [ straight ball Roy Scheider ].
me -- him -- favor -- that is, it may be The reoonofu number of the Soviet Union contrastive with a historic beautiful spacecraft Discovery number (it seems that it is somehow caught in prohibition words and phrases although a motif is "being").
This is also fun.
moreover, HAL9000 which carried out the life request at the bow man just before "being killed" by the previous work -- a complete change is undergone and it can be last made to cry

2004/06/02 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by スリント人 Provider: 6658 Host:6732 Browser: 4127
Once, although it was the sequel of a previous work "2001: A Space Odyssey", it struck and changed and had become a very intelligible story to the previous work.
(although the previous work went to put concentration only into a previous work and to see) It will be sequel public presentation 16 years after from a previous work...
Although it is a surprise, is it touch that he can understand 2001- only after there is also episode which solves the mystery of a previous work and seeing this work, as a fan?
Since there was a comparatively action-element, I think that it had become the structure which feels easy also about a general visitor and can be admired also about the neighborhood.
Do I recommend the work here too from a previous work as individual comment?
Do I remain on the last scene, if it is the Chandler doctor's position?
To HAL9000 and one clue (^^;) it cannot go, if HAL9000 is placed with that - (泣)

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.