Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Movie ranking: Rank 298/in 1,491 titles (Total 8.00/Deviation 50.27) Rank 297 <= => Rank 299
Movie ranking of 1994: Rank 8/in 30 titles Rank 7 <= => Rank 9

Ed Wood(Movie)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(DVD)

Latest DVD: 2008/02/05 ():

Drive-In Cult Classics - 8 Movie Set $98

DVD(84hit) Sales/Latest						VHS(69hit) Sales/Latest	Books(653hit) Sales/Latest	Music(29hit) Sales/Latest	Toys(17hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:182 Drive-In Cult Classics - 8 Movie Set Tag:$98 2008/02/05 () Eval.:***** 1.SOMETHING TO WATCH	Rank:418 Sleepy Hollow Tag:$99 2000/05/23 () Eval.:***** 1.wonderful legend!	Rank:444 Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas Tag:$98 1998/11/17 () Eval.:***** 1."I just wanted to carve a little Z on your forehead"	Rank:511 Horror Classics 50 Movie Pack Collection Tag:$98 2004/01/20 () Eval.:***** 1.horror classics 50 movie pack	Rank:526 Chocolat (Miramax Collector's Series) Tag:$99 2001/08/07 () Eval.:***** 1.wonderful movie - especially if you love chocolate	Rank:777 Edward Scissorhands (Widescreen Anniversary Edition) Tag:$98 2000/09/05 () Eval.:***** 1.a visual feast for the eyes	Rank:2010 VHS Tape:Nixon Tag:$99 1997/03/04 () Eval.:***** 1.A more personal, wiley and stylistic edition of JFK	Rank:36532 Paperback:Classic Sourdoughs: A Home Baker's Handbook Tag:$95 2001/12 () Eval.:***** 1.Classic Sourdoughs	Rank:22191 Audio CD:Ed Wood: Original Soundtrack Recording Tag:$98 1994/10/18 () Eval.:***** 1.Great work, representing a great man...	Rank:880 Toy:Melissa & Doug Vehicles Chunky Wooden Puzzle Tag:$99 2006/06/12 () Eval.:***** 1.quality not the same!!

Information about this title

Tim Burton
Howard Shore
JOHNNY DEPP
Sarah Jessica Parker
Jeffrey Jones
Bill Murray
Lisa Marie
Martin Landau
Vincent D'Onofrio Hayakawa Publishing Corporation

Released:1994/09/28 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	MovieRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(2.00)	298	50.27	8.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	1,077	4	4
Outside Japan	104	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

25.0%

50.0%

25.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

25%

75%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9
2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) All
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	All

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/05/05 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by 青いエビータ Provider: 36591 Host:36455 Browser: 3874
Although I made it a hobby to write a picture and a novel, I thought that I was the movie which has some which sound the uncanny heart to those [ these ] that are making movie って monochrome.
It progresses in front anyhow first.
Thinking for the time being is later.
Dash with passion and love anyhow.
don't think -- it feels It does not get used to a creator without them.
Although I hear that the life of the after that of this movie which was not blessed with the talent in order that there may be love to a movie however after all, but was finished as the happy end although Ed was a good person as a reasonable creature was miserable, it is wonderful to have not lost it but to have tackled positively.
On the gay reverse side of Hollywood, hard struggle of many people who are talentless in this way should also serve as the soil.
If it sees to a normal, without seeing this work although he actually saw three movies of his after seeing this work incidentally, it may only merely be visible to chiipu and a petty work.

2008/04/03 Good [Original Japanese review]
by HUNGRY SPIDER Review history[Good:1(25%) Normal:1(25%) Bad:2(50%)] / Provider: 14019 Host:14280 Browser: 7395
Although singular genius Tim Burton is comedy movie -- which reproduced the half-raw of "the lowest ever film director" based on the true story, honestly he feels resistance for catching this work with a "comedy." The reason is easy.
It is because it cannot laugh.
I think that the element which exists in this work and which evokes "laughter" is collected "for the first time in lack of the objectivity of Ed Wood." or it is interesting - it is boring -- that judgment standard -- one's radius of less than 1m -- asking (that is, it depending only on subjectivity) -- patt -- 見で -- an amateur -- extensive -- appointing -- 情 -- being moved -- abrupt -- role change -- carrying out -- unauthorized -- photography -- venturing -- riteiku -- not taking out -- he in appearance in the work is existence with unrelated calm analysis power and circumstantial judgment capability which cannot be considered the after point in this way It can be said that it was moving only off the top of its head mostly.
The aspect of making the work which cannot be about regarded as a film director is presented.
The movie which he manufactures is on parade [ of a trash ] so that naturally.
It will also be made dim [ the 奇天烈さ ] for those who do not know the movie used as former neta to catch a glimpse of one cut of the photography spot and finished goods (he was so).
Player -- of a mismatch of the mechanism in which the open mouth stops closing etc.
is [ the set and the contents of a work which turn out to be imitation at a glance ] completely jostling.
Although this work is providing a televiewer with the product of his action with Ed without objectivity and probably does not have profit with "maji!
It is the work of having tied to laughter by making tsukkomi put into the condition called ".
However, if it is asked whether he was able to laugh now, though regrettable, it can only answer "yes, but it laughed and the face had 引き攣ed." It is because the direction of the pessimism hidden in this work won Ed's strange 奇天烈な action far when it was said [ why ] whether it was.
It was not presupposed to the pathos Ed is not understood to be that anxiety ている will understand senses of values other than itself also for him by one side.
At least about the movie, that was right.
The view was too narrow by the time it was extreme.
He does not have objectivity, but dashes only with passion, and, always finally is accident っていた.
Needless to say, he was an eccentric person.
Therefore, probably, it was loved by people who are not common.
However, how was he reflected in a matomo person's eyes?
It is made clear.
A matomo critic criticizes a work severely, a matomo sweetheart thrusts separation, and a matomo investor points out the carelessness of a movie.
Although such "ordinary people" belongs to a minority group in appearance in the work, they is the majority in the real world.
It is thought that most worlds are not asking for him not to be accepted in them (is this an overstatement?).
following a way a surely miserable end, if it does not carry out compromising -- the body -- present -- the pessimism of Ed Wood has the too deep shade which thinks will be here (he was not actually able to send out a hit at a world) and which carries out and this side drops on a work the bottom For the reason, he has experienced the state where it cannot laugh for laughing.
That is not right, either, if it says and this work is said whether to be a trash.
Rather, it will be bundled under the category of the work which was able to improve.
It is like making it two above-mentioned elements, and expressing "depth" of this work as it is earnestly, if it thinks.
such [ in the made bad work and the work which does not sound a breast ] "delicacy" -- it should also taste -- it will not be If it says why the "delicate touch" was brewed, I will think that it is in indifferent depiction of this work.
Ed -- contrary to him, this work is calmness very much Ed's action is pointed out to appearance in the work always (blame.).
Though it thinks that it is suspicious, very busy senses of values, such as a person who does, a person who watches him warmly, and a person who continues associating, exist.
That is, there are many viewpoints in this work.
Ed is made to 客観視 splendidly by this.
A televiewer can be said that the mechanism made calm is ready.
Therefore, the image of human being called Ed Wood will be thrown into relief in the very real form (is how まぁ and this "image" are caught [ but ] televiewer order?).
Since the composition of a work, balance, a person's depiction, etc.
were excellent, this cannot be overemphasized by that it is the result of こそ.
If it applies to loading this neighborhood and a work with emotion, he thinks that he is [ no one but / Director Tim / gifted ].
And this calmness may be just a maker's "love to the minimum supervisor." He lives just because the specific person is regarded as true, and it is appearance.
-- Probably, not only a charming place but all the places that cannot sympathize a useless place were stored in the film.
giving the objectivity which swings emotion, after gazing also at a dirty portion -- people's whole surface -- seeing -- only sukisuki(ing) (or it being made the relish of alcohol) -- it cannot do by any means the depth of the thought to a maker's Ed Wood should hear -- る The also gently sad work which was woven in carefully and filled with emotion to the extent that it does not overflow.
It is finished not only in the inside of Director Tim work, but finely.
But when it sees as まぁ and a comedy, 喰らった is greatly clear in a dodge.
laughter of this work is boiled generally and carried out, it will carry out and even the thing which is not direct and at which it laughs will become doubtful depending on a view However, since only this much is based on a sense of values, it is just going to be hard to carry out how.
From the above reason and comment, the evaluation to its this work presupposes [ be / allowed to た / I ] "very good" slippage "is good."

2007/08/12 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Ny-Jp Provider: 33587 Host:33476 Browser: 3876
It was interesting.
This man was having lived, while having seen Ed's and it having been most worrisome filmed the movie how.
It thought that the scene which makes rugoshi and tako fight, the scene with which an actor takes out O.K.
to colliding with a set and shaking could be seen, then it could eat truly etc., and only it has been very worrisome.
Is the neighborhood with amerika ってこ generous to culture too?
When stress accumulated, it was the person [ たり / disguising oneself as a woman and coming out ] who changed anyhow.
Does the person gathering in it also call it a kind friend only by about individual people?
It met Orson Welles, pierce through yourself was said, and it has been troubled by depiction which pierces through self to the direction which disregarded the right and wrong which can do a general movie in what I may laugh at simply just for a moment.
I think that there is also a work whose picture Ed Wood itself took, and it will see since like.

2006/08/14 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Garireo fuigaro Provider: 27529 Host:27445 Browser: 5717
That did not have only [ there are love to a movie and passion, it is always brightly positive and only popularity is (to however, eccentric person) ] is Ed Wood to which only the talent was called Hollywood minimum film director.
The fiction based on the fact of having applied spot at the time with which the he was shining most.
The sadness on which such a situation is humorously drawn only in about a work with the useless work with which the passion and love to a movie, and they carry out the surroundings, and are done from all, which is not simultaneously evaluated like "not thinking that what I regard as interesting has interesting others" and which is not understood is overflowing from the screen.
the minimum film director -- in the movie of Director Tim Burton the point which has not made a fool of him is [ Director ] also very likable, a thing called the sadness which is not understood appears well, having taken up him who was called right [ that ] It is the representation whether they are Charley and Warren of a chocolate factory.
(this -- Johnny Depp -- actor) a thing called the sadness which is not understood with him himself and a remarkable nerd disposition may be known Sufficient laughter can be taken, even if make the minimum supervisor into koke, it makes a fool of him or it makes him into a criminal in the pillory at any rate.
It does not mistake from the point that such a thing exists mostly on a network, either.
However, risupekuto to such a minimum film director is felt from this work.
Ed Wood is a supervisor [ minimum to be sure ].
Even if it looks at this work, it is understanding enough.
However, as for negative, nobody can do love to his movie, and passion.
Tim Burton understood the love and passion and this movie was manufactured.
it is said that it runs to a hobby too much -- although it may be, there is somewhere tenderness very more warmly than the movie which makes people koke

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.