Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map

AllAnimeGameComicNovelDramaSp. effectJP movieMovie	Info:voice,game..	Reviewers	Diary
Search / Outside DB:

Movie ranking: Rank 1,410/in 1,454 titles (Total -7.00/Deviation 46.74) Rank 1,409 <= => Rank 1,411

JOHNNY MNEMONIC(Movie)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(DVD)

Latest DVD: 2004/06/01 ():

Freejack $98

DVD(10hit) Sales/Latest						VHS(8hit) Sales/Latest	Books(12hit) Sales/Latest	Music(2hit) Sales/Latest	VideoGames(2hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:9683 Dark City (New Line Platinum Series) Tag:$98 1998/07/29 () Eval.:***** 1.New Line degrains again	Rank:14478 Screamers Tag:$95 1998/07/29 () Eval.:***** 1.A really poor sci-fi shaggy dog story	Rank:16099 Freejack Tag:$98 2004/06/01 () Eval.:***** 1.Sci-Fi action with great stars	Rank:32793 Johnny Mnemonic Tag:$95 1997/11/26 () Eval.:***** 1.The Future Looks Disappointing...	Rank:62857 Johnny Mnemonic (Superbit Collection) Tag:$95 2001/10/09 () Eval.:***** 1.The Future Looks Disappointing...	Rank:143341 Johnny Mnemonic Tag:$95 1997/11/26 () Eval.:***** 1.The Future Looks Disappointing...	Rank:45066 VHS Tape:Johnny Mnemonic Tag:$98 1996/04/09 () Eval.:***** 1.The Future Looks Disappointing...	Rank:818387 Paperback:THE SECOND (2nd) OMNI BOOK OF SCIENCE FICTION (2) Two: Johnny Mnemonic; Fivesight; Lobotom... 1981 ()	Rank:65794 Audio CD:Johnny Mnemonic Tag:$98 1995/05/23 () Eval.:***** 1.A few good songs. Not an exquisite CD.	CD-ROM:Johnny Mnemonic (Mac)

Information about this title

Keanu Reeves Dolph Lundgren TAKESHI KITANO

Image gallery sites
1. JM

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	MovieRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Bad(-1.00)	1,410	46.74	-7.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	1,360	7	7
Outside Japan	204	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

14.3%

28.6%

0.0%

14.3%

42.9%

Added percentage

14.3%

42.9%

57.2%

100%

Summary

42.9%

57.2%

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation New!
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) All
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation New!
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	All

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2006/05/21 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 21108 Host:21150 Browser: 5234
In that there is no しょ -, it may be the Guinness class also in the Hollywood work of the 90s.
With [ although Keanu Reeves was still a youngman anyway ] no place which it was eaten by carrying out by excelling completely, and you may completely have.
I will regard with ?
whether such portions are still dragged as serious.
Although the view of the world and image which make the element of "Blade Runner" and next "matrix" consider are what is also likely to give the image ...
which had various influences on the subsequent work, and its contents are too poor and too much call them Class Z movie instead of a B film, they are not an overstatement.
If escaped also from the discriminating thought and the sketchiness of a people from Gaea no one but which are called Japanese perversion, it did not break, but such meanings were also understood by that 本作 is a trash in from 1.
It is difficult for the image with which the important contents of a movie attained to that excelled and cuttlefish れた kyara of し had an impression and impact even at next it of the movie on which it excels and carries out and he takes a megaphone for there to be nothing and to look for a right point portion.
Probably it is は and severe [ of the grade the thing of 本作 wants do excel and carry out and to also already erase self out of memory ].
Don't what [ may be referred to as now inferior even to a movie of Japan ]?
the impression which is likely to escape from the frame of 怪作 and a trash even if it represents Hollywood of the 90s -- there is nothing -- even now -- for Japan -- for the United States -- black -- an impression which is a historical symbol also becomes strong and 本作 will be treated as a stain-thing for Japan-U.S.
both sides in such meaning excelling -- carrying out -- it is having participated in this movie and possibly, also often and bad, the portion of the know-how of a movie was absorbed -- carrying out -- the grade -- although it is severe one -- Keanu Reeves -- such かどうかs [ having excelled, having carried out and having had の severity ] -- a great question し [ anyway, many of starring movies after 本作 do not have not a masterpiece but much 怪作 and it was not very necessarily seen in efforts for the improvement in performance power ].

2005/10/30 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Hanburabi Provider: 8327 Host:8206 Browser: 5234
Since the direction which has already expressed the appropriate opinion comes, my comment is taken as a brief thing.
A work halfway all fields.
Since all are halfway, there is no highlight.
I at least was not able to find out the value which kills time.

2005/03/04 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Yam. Provider: 50109 Host:50182 Browser: 6206
Although it was common well, since the image was interesting, it is good kana.
although William Gibson likes it -- easy -- conversion to signals -- し it does not do Although mind that I wanted you to already describe かさん which is exactly just for a moment is carried out.
With [ cyberpunk ] no hazure.
I think that it is individual.
Although it is only cyberpunk liking って simply.
Well, I think that it is not the work said this way and that to there but the movie which enjoys an image simply.

2004/12/28 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by エリス博士 Provider: 30260 Host:30139 Browser: 4184
So far, a severe work is also new.
a large -- I call it a trash and think that it does not interfere A screen version of "memory store Johnnie" is made by Keanu Reeves starring.
With [ a story ] no contents.
What has a twist nothing [ an image ] too cheap.
But halfway one is [ in / all / are not aiming at Class B and ] fatal.
All [ the element with which a cyberpunk-story is not what thing except common, either, and attracts an eye ].
It is a movie to really give what ...
It is merely too severe.
A contents grade is too as low as it thinks that an amateur would not make.
It is the story which is not seen by the child, either.

2004/09/27 Good [Original Japanese review]
by nack Provider: 16614 Host:16432 Browser: 3875
The near future SF action film which the combination of Keanu Reeves and Beat Takeshi called subject.
けど and the whole for which money will be required although the cyber which often exists also gets and it is touch -- B -- class -- it felt, and was the atmosphere pleasant to have come out on the contrary?
The Mirai-Sha meeting in which the illness incurable under the influence of electromagnetic waves, such as a computer, is spreading.
Keanu Reeves is a "memory store" which embeds special equipment in its brain and carries huge information.
Since it was the information on the specific medicine which cures the illness with which the information which he inputted at a certain time spreads in society in fact, fighting [ which aims at this data / be / worthless ] starts ...
(An original novel is "memory store Johnnie" surely) the well fairly common talk to say -- it is -- the whole image image -- sutaroon and my shuワ -- per -- they are a cyber-action thing and touch of the same kind The slightly novel place had just been going to try conversion to signals of digital cyberspace hard, and most efforts for making a movie were touch whether it applied to the CG expression.
Although it was the Beat Takeshi appointment considered to have been conscious of the Japanese market, wasn't there any meaning out of which excels not much and し comes?
Although it is a worthless boss, if it is a Japanese supervisor, I will think that production which excels more and employs し efficiently was made.
Although there is various dissatisfaction well, if it sees by eye called a B film as written first, it will be the movie which can be enjoyed as it is.

2004/06/04 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by Morochi Provider: 6034 Host:5993 Browser: 3875
the beat whose carrier って's of the information that memorize data important in one's head in large quantities, and it is carried was good -- also carrying out -- although it was appearing, can this man do only such performance?
し it is always a role of worthless ...
doesn't any work 見て become better for the change?
It was interesting at a setup which appeared to the dolphin and changed to inside 々.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.