Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews
Others
Site map

Search / Outside DB:

Movie ranking: Rank 1,463/in 1,463 titles (Total -93.00/Deviation 26.45) Rank 1,462 <=
Movie average points ranking: Rank 224/in 225 titles (Average -1.86(Very bad)/Deviation 21.50) Rank 223 <= => Rank 225 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Movie ranking of 2001: Rank 44/in 44 titles Rank 43 <=

Pearl Harbor(Movie)


[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)
ForumDiary
2007/12/08
ImagesGoods
(DVD)
Latest DVD: 2008/02/26 ():30 Days of Night $95
DVD(145hit)
Sales/Latest
VHS(122hit)
Sales/Latest
Books(1659hit)
Sales/Latest
Music(30hit)
Sales/Latest
VideoGames(25hit)
Sales/Latest
Toys(33hit)
Sales/Latest
Rank:745
Titanic (10th Anniversary Edition)

Tag:$99
2007/11/20
()
Eval.:*****

1.Hilarious alternate ending
Rank:1085
Saving Private Ryan (Special Limited Edition)

Tag:$99
1999/11/02
()
Eval.:*****

1.D-pressing
Rank:1091
Armageddon

Tag:$99
1999/01/05
()
Eval.:*****

1.A celebration of excitement and excess
Rank:1357
Pearl Harbor (Two-Disc 60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition)

Tag:$99
2001/12/04
()
Eval.:*****

1.My favorite portrayal of "Pearl Harbour Re-Enactments"
Rank:1847
30 Days of Night

Tag:$95
2008/02/26
()
Eval.:*****

1.Just a couple Natives in Barrow?
Rank:5027
VHS Tape:The World At War - 9 Volume Gift Set

Tag:$98
2000/09/19
()
Eval.:*****

1.The authoritative series on The Second World War
Rank:26881
Paperback:The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11

Tag:$00
2004/03
()
Eval.:*****

1.September 11, 2001 Day of Deceit
Rank:4324
Audio CD:Pearl Harbor

Tag:$98
2001/05/22
()
Eval.:*****

1.If God were a composer
Rank:9736
CD-ROM:Attack on Pearl Harbor

Tag:$99
2007/07/30
()
Eval.:*****

1.Fun arcade-style air combat
Rank:11455
Toy:Pokemon Card Game Great Encounters (Diamond & Pearl IV) Booster Pack
Information about this title

Michael Bay Jerry Bruckheimer
Hans Zimmer
Ben Affleck
Josh Hartnett
Kate Beckinsale
William Lee Scott
Ewen Bremner
Jaime King
Jennifer Garner
Cuba Gooding Jr.

Colm Feore
Peter Firth
Tom Sizemore
Scott Wilson
Tomas Arana
William Fichtner
Mako
Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa
Dan Aykroyd
Alec Baldwin
Jon Voight Guy Torry
Leland Orser Beth Grant
Released:2001/07/14 in Japan
Official sites
1. http://www.movies.co.jp/pearlharbor/ (Translation)
Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)
 AverageMovieRankDeviation(Total)Evaluation points(Total)Best of the Best
Inside JapanVery bad(-1.86)1,46326.45-93.00 

Statics of activity

Total ViewsCommentEvaluation
Inside Japan13,2825250
Outside Japan44500

How others evaluated in Japan

BestVery GoodGoodNormalBadVery BadWorst
People30353630
Percentage6.0%0.0%6.0%10.0%6.0%12.0%60.0%
Added percentage6%6%12%22%28%40%100%
Summary12%10.0%78%
                                                                                                    

Views for recent 8 days
Total2019181716151413
12
1
3
0
1
1
1
3
2

LanguageSorted by dateSorted by recommendation New!
EnglishGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
None
JapaneseGood
(Only Evaluation)
Normal
(Only Evaluation)
Bad
(Only Evaluation)
All
(Only Evaluation)
All
This reputation board


Post your review / Top page
The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2008/08/17 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Deiipuburuu Provider: 4059 Host:3851 Browser: 3876
"
[a good point]
-- too -- gold or けている -- it is -- an image is uncanny" -- a word .

[Bad point]
A love story as if it also carried out imitation of Titanic is not needed.
Historical fact historical investigation is intentional (?).
Dramatization (?) It makes a mistake (?).
The point which can be seen.
First of all, it participates in a green zero game etc.
at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack, and is better たっけ.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
About depiction of a Japanese army, it was well called as expected, or since depiction of the Japanese army of this movie "window tookaazu" that similarly treated the Pacific War by public presentation next year was also a bitter smile thing very well individually, as compared with it, it was not worrisome.
However, probably, it is not needed to draw a douu liter attack party.
if it is made to finish it as the Pearl Harbor attack -- that last -- going down -- puropaganda っぽく感じて of the war justification will not be carried out -- it was regrettable
2008/08/14 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Baadakku Provider: 6794 Host:6761 Browser: 8090
It does not consider but obtains in "ばっかじゃ.
The animation regarded as ".
Already, probably this should not call it a work but should call it an animation.
There is no existence value.
Japan is insulted.
By continuation of a love scene, it is あ.
I considered.
When thinking that DVD was skipped at every scene of the and Japan has come out at last, it is meeting って of a field ....
And as for machine-gun-mopping-up って, Japan is completely drawn for the zero game as a bad fellow in the civilian.
Is it the insult to the spirits of the heroic dead of Japan?
Although surely the civilian had the dead, it did not shoot directly but they are the people killed in a stray shot.
The strategy meeting was also performed in the Imperial Headquarters.
It is to have improved it borokuso so far well at koke ....
What idea てたん is a supervisor?
Because of what is it school 行ってた?
It is the same as having said that Japan has all war responsibility.
It is the animation of U.S.
banzai Japan student spirit.
Well, since he dislikes Japan, Macdonald's members of a head are such animations .....
When drawing the United States also in Japan, it does not write severely to there ....
A movie suitable as a movie of the Pearl Harbor attack, "it is tora!
tora!
tora!
Is it "?
It will be brainwashed if it begins to see from such の.
But it is sad that there are some persons who look at and believe this.
although he does not want to also carry out evaluation evaluation -- once .
Since it is a highest-class trash, evaluation is below the super-worst.

2008/07/21 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 十傑集 Provider: 5474 Host:5319 Browser: 4483
More than Japan is referred to as making a fool, is it the work which makes a fool of war?
Japan -- a Tokyo massive air raid -- the stage -- war -- the U.S.
where, as for there, its native country was not involved in war fire after the Civil War at the time of this-work work although it was probably struck considerably, if the love romance thing of the け there was manufactured Peace dotage = the scale of a lack of understanding to war is different.
There was nothing.
Has it exported to Japan well in what depiction of a love element was also praised for?
but becoming [ carry out and / there are faults on both sides ] kana -- to which "war being a fashion" and the playful animation supervisor who says appeared also in Japan after this
2008/07/20 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 消しゴム Provider: 51582 Host:51634 Browser: 5234
The love romance which delivered a Pearl Harbor attack the stage.
The producer who thought of such an irrational plan and showed in the movie theater deserves contempt.
From the contents by which the whole work was constituted only from a love scene and a battle scene, much time clove on the love scene and the battle scene is expeled to the corner.
There was no meaning which makes a historical occurrence the stage at this time, and it was completely a failing mark as a war movie.
The battle scene which committed the taboo of the history movie maximum which divides two influence by black and white does not have the specification of "extravagant playing at soldiers" and expression, and the mouth which he opened was not closed at a lack [ the help which cannot exist ] in the work of the pro who does not sound the heart even if it sees a love scene.

2008/07/02 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Konsuru Provider: 14213 Host:14251 Browser: 2852(Mobile)
disagreeable あ -- the severe movie by which Japan was drawn on borokuso is also new so far -- good -- Japan -- it can open to the public -- a shelf The United States knew prediction before the Pearl Harbor "surprise attack" って言うけど and the attack on Japan.
I merely wanted the cause and reason of war.
then -- forcibly -- "a surprise attack" -- making -- solving -- "rimenbaa Pearl Harbor" -- saying -- such movie 作っちゃう and ......
the worst
2008/07/02 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Fuotsudo Provider: 3196 Host:3180 Browser: 5234
The contents っちゃ [ since it is deep, say, and ] and are good.
Japan also thinks that it did such a cowardly thing.
But, I think that Japanese people are insulted clearly.
Now, although considered, a U.S.
history movie has many movies by which they were damaged.
If it is んなもん作るん, I want you to make the cruel thing which they have done.
Although Pearl Harbor is also severe, I want you to also know the cruelness of atomic bomb dropping to a Tokyo massive air raid, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki.

2008/06/16 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by かい2005 Provider: 3799 Host:3775 Browser: 5234
It does not become impossible that I consider by the thing which are not got blocked and for which it did not say that it was disagreeable but childish love was involved in most stories so that it may be the movie which is not [ thin く詰ま ] since it is the movie of an anti-day.
natural also during war -- having wanted to make it a war movie and having wanted to make it a love movie, although there was probably also such love -- it does not understand well "With U.S.
banzai" Was the way of drawing toward which it inclined considerably adopted?
It is being [ it / unavoidable, since the United States side draws ] kana.
I want you to make it finish it as a fiction from the beginning to the last without mixing original history delicately if history and the fact are bent and drawn, although it did not think that it was so disagreeable since it considered -- it was thought that it cut The airplane of the Japanese army which is flying for the Pearl Harbor attack was large herd みたい of a dragonfly.
Probably, it was not flying to 虫みたい like that.
CG also seems to be light, is carried out the bottom and lacks in force.
It was not quite satisfactory.
The battle scene was also daradara(ed) and expression did not have skillful く.
Performance of the leading role's people is severe [ which was appearing / of performance of a Japanese and Japanese descent ] better.
I am looking as a Japanese I want Japanese to appear on those who can talk with a kitchen, and those who can do a play dignifiedly, and thought that it was shameful.
Evaluation will presuppose "It is very bad."
2008/06/09 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 基本甘口 Provider: 22424 Host:22467 Browser: 8090
the United States -- the movie with which aho to distribute to the world built that it is various Probably, the United States still has many war supporter groups, since such aho is.
If you want to acquire knowledge about war, cancer dam view たほう is good absolutely.
Neither justice nor wrong is in war.
Those who are fighting believe that it is connected peacefully that they are doing.
It turns out well that it says.
The work only a defeated nation is made into a bad fellow by World War II, and seemingly justice is [ work ] the United States which has struck publicly [ master ].
the hit where only Japan shines is accepted in China which has beaten this and the tragedy publicly [ master ] -- or .
It is ignorant in history, and those whom, as for that war, Japan regards as bad with it being all-out will not become unpleasant even if they see.
Those who know the reverse-side side of that war that has not appeared in a textbook had better not see by any means.
since does not remain, after seeing
2008/03/22 Best! [Original Japanese review]
by Negabeidaa Provider: 2744 Host:2622 Browser: 3876
Although there are many problems very It is wonderful that "the weakness of Japan" which was was revised by the war movie to which the latest Japan comes out.
Next, I want my kerubei to photograph the offing naval battle of Leyte.
It is not necessary to say and evaluation is the highest.
It is hard to evaluate the meeting of あ and a field.

2008/02/29 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Kaniya Provider: 35635 Host:35372 Browser: 4926
I of those days who looked at this did not so much have historical knowledge.
being certain -- と -- seemingly, World War II started in the surprise attack of Pearl Harbor, when carrying out -- at least the recognition made the mistake in calling - was a thing I want to mention the good place with えっ.
The depiction before a sortie of Japanese soldiers was very good in itself.
the "father Lord" -- it is やたら-stiff, and it is tolerance level, although it was sufficient and there was also much strange depiction The breast got hot, saying, "The people which fought and died in this way for the country were a lot", and the tear also came out of the place which the zero game of Japan has bombed.
It turns out that the United States gets angry in response to the attack from Japan.
Appearing in retaliation also gives a nod of assent.
But does it become the view that what the United States did by wrong what was done [ of Japan ] why for is right as for doing although both are bombings?
the flower garden that it is right which it is as for war, and this movie is wrong in which -- a diagram [ 全開 ] -- all -- useless -- carrying out -- て .
As [ became / completely / not only Japan but depiction of an American soldier or a service-in-the-war nurse / incidentally ] I also regarded especially a nurse and a woman as it being the depiction whose fool was very made.
It is also conviction that it was disrepute also in U.S.
native country.

2007/09/30 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 24時間鬼ごっこ Provider: 18244 Host:18291 Browser: 3876
They are akan and ろ, when licking and shining, carrying Japanese people into such もん Japan and broadcasting them joyfully!
akan 言うて which gave to the film preview of this by the aircraft carrier or something, and Japanese people looked at, やん which deleted the scene or was inserted so that it might bring to Japan and to say, and such もんうれしがってみてる奴 is aho!
the amusing fellow of ねん which was done without the 思たねん ?
title when what day book by which it does not come why would show and which was good as for た and others, and a U.S.
influence -- seeing - ひん to Japan -- Japan -- Hiroshima Nagasaki of an atomic bomb -- た yes which had and went to the movie 8 て United States about things -- ねんな honma what by which it does not come the back -- 見てちょっ -- yes -- or 思た war is not bad, either -- the amusing fellow who thinks and has -- て Mr.
ねん the desperate and worst movie without main ん -- a つくらな war -- akan もん -- the fellow through whom neither what nor て思 passes -- て Mr.
ねん せ -- since -- enough, it saw perfectly and the movie through which it does not pass, and this ねんな aversion carried out
2007/06/26 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Meteo Provider: 19923 Host:20013 Browser: 3162
A movie which glorifies war is useless.
Although it was important contents, that was severe, considering me who am seldom rightist inclinations.
なよ which will be taken out with Japan if it says that it is the Japanese worst.
It is not needed for production and a war thing in ていう, love, etc.
It cannot be bad that Japanese people also have patriotism.

2006/11/22 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by 爆音 Provider: 8677 Host:8629 Browser: 5234
For the United States, Japan is wrong at justice....
That war is a movie which Japan makes regard it as 100% being bad.
Displeasure, such as a dampish U.S.
method of ibiri, makes and exhibited such [ just now ] a movie more than the half-century, and, as for tokoton bellies, such as a victim-style, they stood.
There is nothing for war in justice, wrong, etc.
...
Is it the last movie which Japanese people would see?
.....
It is the grade which 飽きs bored "at the worst" and is insufficient.

2006/10/17 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by K コバヤシ Provider: 17548 Host:17423 Browser: 7856
If Japanese people see absolutely, they are hopeless.
the United States -- if a person ignorant in this mansee work has this absolutely true -- misapprehension striped arm しょう contents -- already -- fabrication -- だらけ And the United States is justice and the one-sided production that Japan is wrong is made.
Misapprehension will be caused, if this is seen ordinarily and all Japan is bad also in whom.
Although it does not write since a fine place dares become long, if it refers to a network, it will come out without limit.
If it carries out, of course well from me who am a Japanese, naturally the evaluation of this work which goes up to number one also in the work which I want to be erased as black history is the worst.

2006/07/19 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Ainshutain Provider: 11516 Host:11686 Browser: 6287
Japanese people are not outstanding movies....
I want to get angry, when seeing, and to come to riot.
Do an anti-day movie only in the United States.
The worst ever movie.
With no value to see.
I do not want to see, even if it gets gold.
A battle scene is also daradaradaradara.

2006/06/05 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Hasuraa Provider: 7325 Host:7100 Browser: 5234
being severe -- しか -- it is the anti-day movie which cannot be said It is not very such a thing although the historical teacher had extolled since before the Pearl Harbor attack drawn from the United States side, and public presentation.
Time is long and the talk is るい cut considerably.
Although the place praised is at least the battle scene of CG, it is partially jealous also of this.
the way which a bomb precious to a hospital on this movie is dropped, and is not the army facility, either, although the Japanese army should not be attacked in a private sector institution -- as long as -- although a certain machine-gun cartridge was shot and Japan impressed with the bad fellow, since he was surely doing, Japan was also doing -- making a mistake in being alike, and making, if there is nothing -- しか -- I cannot consider Most casualties of the first and a civilian are the fragments of the antiaircraft gun which the U.S.
Forces shot etc., and it is sushi....
Many scenes which made a fool of Japan besides it have come out.
Evaluation is not nothing less than the worst.

2006/05/08 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Andei Provider: 37646 Host:37767 Browser: 6300
if it is Americans' yota talk -- yet -- 100 steps -- yielding -- not understanding -- covering immense money and exhibiting it moreover also in Japan of neta of slander, although there is nothing -- Does it only seem "whether to be baka"?
factual historical-investigation muchakucha, useless love depiction, and "-- for the time being -- anyhow -- the cause of Japan -- carrying out -- ちゃえ" -- is it the movie with which it saw and a slovenly way [ た / a slovenly way ], and the childish way of thinking were got blocked?
If it was gag, although it was still good, it is to large seriousness.
Is the man of the movie company which decided to exhibit this in Japan who?
Senses are suspected.
if it is backbiting -- at least -- him -- being absent -- if -- こ -- carry out -- it is with ってこ
2006/03/10 Comment(bad) [Original Japanese review]
by 634 Provider: 20475 Host:20569 Browser: 5234
Probably the staff will not look at "tora !
tora !
tora" (although many in the direction of this bulletin board have said and being cooked).
CG is thin -- this one is like [ in the force of the on-the-spot photo which is and blows away a scene etc.
/ although it is an old movie ] 本作 -- super- -- it is because it is the contents looked at by whether it is 遙 rather than the trash something The scenes in which the にという depiction which is not glorified so far does not have しょ - in this or this, either are [ successive occurrence and bakasutaffu of the United States which believes gay shaharakiri in addition even if the 21st century will moreover come ] 創った, and a good thing should not become good, either.
the grade with which a Japanese army of those days is inefficient-like [ a strategy meeting ], and it similarly is not believed in vertical division society that it is -- although kicked, by Chuichi Nagumo's having still ridden on "Akagi" by the historical fact, having done in the old way of thinking rode on the battleship "Nagato" of the known Japan mainland which Isoroku Yamamoto of those days left in 遙, and it had taken command, and it is idle -- for the first time in -- it puts into practice Furthermore, a small midget submarine shell target's thing is also boka(ed), Japan of those days had not delivered an attack to a private sector institution, a misapprehension is also excessive and a change does not have it in it being Class Z movie deceived only in apparent beauty.
it did not need to carry into a love story in war etc., and besides Hull Note of an anti-Japanese game, even the soldiers of not only Japan but Hawaii threw away, and it was done to having been made the form of a surprise attack by Roosevelt at the piece -- if the ugly truth of such United States is therefore known -- a trash -- it is not whom of an except, either -- not evaluating -- it will not obtain し [ the truth by which the soldiers of Pearl Harbor were made the sacrifice of the political dealings at this time was not told ].
し it is the contents which also make it baka to draw what is connected with way middo called the Doolittle air-strikes strategy on the last -- the trash of this movie -- a degree is more than "Rising Sun" the United States will not emphasize that only a movie without contents can be filmed only by it being weak to build a history supekutaru movie and being showy, either -- alike -- 。 the history more than a aho love story was soiled, and, now, the U.S.
seamen who sleep in Arizona more than a Japanese army are insulted -- as -- I can consider The U.S.
soldiers killed in war in the anti-Japanese game, not to mention the Japanese soldier by whom 創られて was slaughtered, or the public, will not save their face only in about such a movie, either.

2006/03/10 Good [Original Japanese review]
by Supan Provider: 26048 Host:25873 Browser: 5234
Although carried out by story nature not being so high, as it is, only image depiction can be evaluated.
In order to attack Pearl Harbor, does he fairly like the scene on which the general citizen is gazing at the airplane of the Japanese army which flies toward the harbor miraculously?
Although an important battle scene receives an impression like a repetition of the similar thing, since force was so so, it is still 良しと(ed).
The Japanese mainland bombing from the aircraft carrier which is the main of the final stage must have been an important occurrence used as the cause to energize the U.S., even if seen historically surely, and I think that it was the selection very much good as production of a highlight which was carried out to a setup used as the stage of a work that the hero had participated in this strategy temporally.
anti-day & -- the U.S.
-- although a banzai point is blamed earnestly -- my case -- present -- seeing -- although it does not understand, since especially such a thing was seen without thinking, about this point, it does not have the minus impression so much those days however, the strategy meeting place in Japan -- the outdoors -- it is -- in addition -- and the flag is stood -- seeing -- "-- gradually -- the Age of Civil Wars ...
there are " and memory which smiled bitterly It complemented in the brain and was looking for being what "the misapprehension foreigner who regards Japan as it being still the country of sum rye and geisha" built not only in the point of まぁこ, but on the whole.
Although surely some may be done and there may be a field [ pass ], if its own country manufactures the war movie which is a hero, し [ distortion of some histories for just the difference in a grade justifying that and its own country will also carry out unavoidable mind ].
Although the love story was also regarded as it having been kuso, since it was carrying out through [ of this ], it was not worrisome to there.
You are likely to want to carry out through [ of the element which may be set as the object of criticism to this work ] considerably, and to see it at the time of viewing and listening.
If it thinks like this, don't you have the minus impression so much to this work individually?
Favorite Ben Affleck of まぁ私 was also doing so so good performance, and too, since the image sides were also the contents which deserve evaluation as it is, evaluation will presuppose "It is good."
2006/03/10 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by Naitosutookaa Provider: 9016 Host:8969 Browser: 4483
1942, Hawaii.
It is the fighter pilot of the Pearl Harbor naval base, and they are the best friends' reifu and Danny.
And Eve Lynn, the nurse belonging to a base.
War, and that "day of fate" and their fate begin to move greatly ...
The tale of fighting [ to which U.S.
pride was applied / of three persons ].
Well, now, although it is needless to say in how, in fact, he is not this work そん what dislike.
Depiction of そりゃ and Japan is unreasonable 苦茶, it is glorified and no characters of the United States shine, so that there cannot be, most Pearl Harbor attacks are CG show, and "it is delicate" cannot say them with "It is good" as a far coarse love story etc.
and a movie at all compared with Titanic.
But !
It comes out and the scene of the Pearl Harbor attack is a force full load.
what can still allow 本作 -- it bit -- し it is the image which is seen and can be called "sugee" -- what is anyhow uncannier than anything -- parenthesis merit [ the fighter sortie scene of the Japanese army of the middle stage /!!
] of production It is not an overstatement, although it said clearly and he has allowed only this 1 scene sake "Pearl Harbor"!!
Once Probably, the scene on which the Japanese army is drawn with the sufficient (pictorially) parenthesis so far on the movie of all ages and countries does not exist.
It is the scene of kimekime and kime まくり also including promotion-the production and composition of the music of alder sujimaa, and the eighteenth of a bay, and the arrival-on-the-deck-of-a-ship guidance member which shakes the flag of a sortie.
Expecting a profound history great work to supervisor my kerubei which makes a subject a movie for teens like "Armageddon" and "bat boys" itself may make a mistake also in the opinion well said to it "the history fact is distorted." First of all, it can be said that it is impossible to draw impartially the U.S.
navy, the Department of Defense, and history moreover like the Pearl Harbor attack on the U.S.
Secretary of Defense full cooperation etc.
When you are seeing the movie, the place where it turns out clearly that the army put the hand into the scenario earnestly is amusing.
But jelly burakkaima of manufacture - Probably it included and especially a supervisor's my kerubei was good at it.
Although their (especially my kerubei) purpose is or it makes "a showy movie" how, although it understands if their work is seen, and わ言 boiled confidence full, saying, "I wanted to make it a faithful work historically" is spattered by saying If it is as severe as it cannot think that depiction of Japan studied history very much comparatively [ the ] and thinks whether to be simple U.S.
praise (that depiction (especially meeting of a combined fleet) cannot exist overseas [ of how much ] nowadays) whether it is "sufficient [ ど- ]" should ask [ a maker side / a history target or a political thing ] production with a mecha parenthesis sufficient [ the sortie of a Japanese army ] having written above how with kime ていたり (it said clearly and the parenthesis of that scene was better than any scene of this movie whose American is a subject) -- る The theme is "how to make the surprise attack of Pearl Harbor into the Ohasama power image of attraction surprise of an amusement park!?" for them (as for the shot which catches the bomb which falls to especially battleship Arizona by bird's-eye view, the aim is imagined).
it did not matter at all in order that the heroine may make a U.S.
praise-speech suddenly on the last scene from the military authorities if it will be glorified to the extent that a hand is added to a scenario how much and there cannot be no character of a historical fact, if even a battleship and equipments can be borrowed (especially Roosevelt) -- make a mistake in being alike and there is nothing It is the photography spot of meikingu, and if it looks at a blasting scene and it looks at my kerubei which frolics joyfully and is issuing directions, it is clear.
Well, that it can say anyhow should say that this movie does not want to see at a U.S.
theater.
Or [ becoming what, if one Jap walks and comes from a movie theater at a U.S.
theater ] ...
Well, since it is disreputable also in the United States, is it OK?
Postscript: The one [ dislike / this movie ] recommends you "team amerika" which the tray parka of a "south park" manufactured.
Since the insertion song which made this movie koke thoroughly in the middle stage flows out, they are a must and 必聴 also including a fan.
(just for a moment -- -- it becomes pitiful)
Next / Post your review / Top page
ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.
Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.



Please give your evaluation or comment.

You need two other people's comment to post your comment again after you post your evaluation or comment.

Your Name(Required)
Password (Required. more than 4 characters)
Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.
Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.


Top page of DB | Site map | Copyright(c) 1999- 1st Class All rights reserved