Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Movie ranking: Rank 1,457/in 1,487 titles (Total -9.00/Deviation 46.26) Rank 1,456 <= => Rank 1,458
Movie average points ranking: Rank 223/in 236 titles (Average -0.90(Bad)/Deviation 31.56) Rank 222 <= => Rank 224 (more than 10 evaluatoin)
Movie ranking of 2000: Rank 36/in 38 titles Rank 35 <= => Rank 37

THE PERFECT STORM(Movie)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(DVD)

Latest DVD: 2008/10/06 ():

2008 Global Conference: U.S. Overview: A Perfect Storm Ahead? $95

DVD(43hit) Sales/Latest						VHS(6hit) Sales/Latest	Books(216hit) Sales/Latest	Music(16hit) Sales/Latest	Toys(1hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:1774 U-571 (Collector's Edition) Tag:$99 2000/10/24 () Eval.:***** 1.Movie: 3/5 Picture Quality: 3/5 Sound Quality: 5/5 Extras: 1.5/5	Rank:2810 The Perfect Storm Tag:$98 2004/06/01 () Eval.:***** 1.See the movie	Rank:2906 Blu-ray:Twister [Blu-ray] Tag:$99 2008/05/06 () Eval.:***** 1.a MUST have!!!!	Rank:3250 Perfect Strangers - The Complete First and Second Seasons Tag:$98 2008/02/05 () Eval.:***** 1.Perfect Strangers on DVD...finally!	Rank:3771 HD DVD:The Perfect Storm [HD DVD] Tag:$99 2006/06/06 () Eval.:***** 1.See the movie	Rank:4389 Stephen King's Storm of the Century Tag:$98 1999/06/22 () Eval.:***** 1.A worthy addition to one's Stephen King film library!	Rank:5035 VHS Tape:The Perfect Storm Tag:$98 2000/11/14 () Eval.:***** 1.See the movie	Rank:292 Hardcover:The Panic of 1907: Lessons Learned from the Market's Perfect Storm Tag:$95 2007/08/31 () Eval.:***** 1.The more things change, the more they remain the same	Rank:83544 Audio CD:the Perfect Storm: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack Tag:$98 2000/06/20 () Eval.:***** 1.Horner's best score the best part of a bad movie.	Rank:164377 Toy:Andrea Gail, "The Perfect Storm" Tag:$99

Information about this title

WolfgangPetersen
Barry Levinson
John Seale
James Horner
GEORGE CLOONEY
Mark Wallberg
Diane Lane
William Fichtner
Bob Gunton
Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio
John Hawkes

Released:2000/07/29 in Japan

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	MovieRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Bad(-0.90)	1,457	46.26	-9.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	1,671	10	10
Outside Japan	162	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

60.0%

10.0%

Added percentage

10%

20%

80%

90%

100%

Summary

10%

10.0%

80%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
5 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2007/10/19 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 下田の里 Provider: 23770 Host:23443 Browser: 4184
The movie "don't lick the sea" when it says at a word.
An understanding of the action principle of characters (fishing boat member) is impossible.
It is a suicidal act to dare come out, although it can predict that it is ruined, if it is man who comes out to the seas, such as a fishing.
thanks to this action, it must be "human depiction which struggles desperately in an extreme situation of the rough sea" of the final stage -- it has thought it imprudent, "isn't only it the natural consequences of its own deed?" since it deals with the marine accident which actually happened, although progress of a tale may be unavoidable (including that end), even if contrary to the 仮令 fact -- one person -- it could be made to survive a grade and you could the "storyteller" last storyteller make it alike -- if -- I think ?
Garrisons and women were still good.
the image centering on the storm of a climax although the work itself is "very bad" -- very well -- beautiful -- and inside 々 -- since it was real, it stops for "it to be bad"

2007/10/19 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by H&J Provider: 25562 Host:25722 Browser: 8090
The tale and I who risked marine men's life and death saw.
They have those [ say / a family or a sweetheart ] who have to protect.
Men come out to the sea for their life.
The number of fish is followed in a poor catch continuation to the fishery which does not go by usual, risking reestablishment of honor.
I cannot settle this as "avarice" and reckless [ "reckless" ].
Although it may glorify too much, "a marine man's pride" was felt for their action which is not given up to the last.
And impression was memorized also to the members who are not going to look back upon their life but are going to rescue a victim although there was also a rescue team's depiction apart from a rare geiru number.
I thought whether since the last is a historical fact base, although it is not those[ with a method ]-ま(ed), as for being the baddo end of all the members death, one person grade survivors could be in it.
If a fish appears in a meal, I will sometimes think, "Is the fisherman who sent this to his own table ん still done vigorously?" Evaluation: It is very good.

2006/07/26 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by Rabukana Provider: 35833 Host:35697 Browser: 4483
Although CG is astonishing Hope is given from the beginning, and empathy only of that is carried out to characters, and no one is saved after all, but I feel that it is meaningless in total destruction.
It is gakkari, after no one will be saved in it, if it expects thinking that they are only those who usually expect "coming back alive at a miracle" if it is called a true story that it finishes happily, since a bat end is moreover the Hollywood work.
It has and evaluation is at "it is bad."

2006/07/26 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 夙夜健 Provider: 18384 Host:18446 Browser: 6287
There is seldom intensity in oil painting fundamentally.
Although this was also seen by association in the movie theater, it is a thing based on a true story, and it is っけ the bottom.
Although the historical fact was important, it was too far from the viewpoint of entame, and it did not seem to be about the value seen even by paying money.

2006/02/05 Worst [Original Japanese review]
by Naooki Provider: 26281 Host:26126 Browser: 4928
CM view ててめっちゃ -- if it thinks that it seems to be interesting -- CM -- that -- back -- how なるん -- と -- having considered and expected -- soko -- the end -- と -- it considered and did the meccha worst

2005/08/11 Very bad [Original Japanese review]
by Shuワrutsueneggaa Provider: 29437 Host:29152 Browser: 3875
The movie which does not twist in けっきょく but has died wholly although there was brave man who fought against the natural threat.
obtaining -, ~ ん ...
it is halfway --- Although seen considerably to the front, if it is a good movie, I will think that there are quite a few scenes which remain in the heart.
But there is no it in this movie.
being only aho in oneself possibly -- かもしれませ .

2005/06/16 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 向井大輔 Provider: 3760 Host:3812 Browser: 4184
Although it special-passed also over the reason for generating which is a perfect storm something and it found and ran away, it does not understand wanting what to carry out anyhow.
It is [ that it is action and ] a drama ...
To a slight degree, may good structure of balance be carried out?
One do not come exactly somehow after all although it is the punch line of dying wholly

2005/06/13 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 馬王 Provider: 18453 Host:18387 Browser: 4184
It is hard to evaluate a movie of this sort somehow.
a panic movie, a natural disaster movie, and something and a 愛って theme divide with ま, and sticks -- よなぁ -- a view -- 4 -- although it may be ちゃ(ed) and impressed, there is also a place where a birthmark and い面 also come out that it is as aiming at impression たり [ and ] [ that the point can be read too much ] Although it is the supekutaru movie made from the movie in which this movie does not have the feature very much especially, either based on the true story -- Incomprehensible [ if there is not why or a saved person, either and it makes only from being / it / a true story /-why mystery (smile) record to all crew member 死ん even if called a true story, it will be weak unconvincing just by it, and ].
However, it needed to be [ which makes it unreasonableness whether to also bless George Clooney with a not much good role to there, and it has recklessly as a man of a grace ].
-- It is wonderful because it turns out to be the hurricane which is not in a precedent.
(まぁ it says right [ that ] although he thinks and likes さ-smile) courageous action completely differs from that it is reckless again - The point which does not understand that a viewpoint should be put where as it is as that the rescue helicopter is worrisome rather from a fishing boat たり is also minus.
The rest was useless although CG was splendid.
Regrettable.

2005/06/11 Normal [Original Japanese review]
by N2 Provider: 22732 Host:22546 Browser: 3874
It is unclear to the last whether it is the movie which he sees in what mental attitude.
harahara by which a big fuss is carried out to the sea of the storm reproduced by - paddle -- the head -- in order to make it empty and to enjoy oneself obediently, for such a fisherman who takes out and exposes a life to danger and a family living, and omission considering as appearance, introduction is comparatively rough it is per trouble or stingy ゃったりする at a rescue team -- it is not praised as kana - feeling -- coming out -- a thing with difficult empathy -- よな saying [ fisherman ] -- George Clooney and Mark Wall Berg -- おっ and こ -- since it is appearance in the stinking 6 case, it becomes cool by ひん or り気分, and た - is, and と does not go, either けど not to spectacular make it easy, the movie which does not fit into what or a jar and is not felt refreshed.

2005/06/05 Bad [Original Japanese review]
by 古典主義 Provider: 5220 Host:5279 Browser: 5234
It is honest comment that the highlight was the movie which is not understood well.
Although cheerful depiction of the persons of the first half will be for enlivening the tragedy of the second half, it is very shallow.
Titanic is recollected also for the point of having taken the subject matter in the past tragedy also as a sea thing also as time exactly.
However, compared with having excelled in depiction that Titanic does its best also in a hopeless situation, although the speech and conduct of the persons of 本作 may be "common", they do not impress emotion which strikes a breast.
The work with which it probably got angry if seen at the theater in such meaning.
It cannot osusume.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.