Japanese works database(How to join/Help)
Top page: All/Only Reviews

Others
Site map


Search / Outside DB:

Movie ranking: Rank 791/in 1,487 titles (Total 2.00/Deviation 48.85) Rank 790 <= => Rank 792

THE QUESTOR TAPES(Movie)

[Other version: RSS/Japanese version]

All
Reviews(Post)

Forum

Images

Goods
(DVD)

Latest DVD: 2004/11/23 ():

Colossus - The Forbin Project $99

DVD(1hit) Sales/Latest	Books(5hit) Sales/Latest
Rank:3576 Colossus - The Forbin Project Tag:$99 2004/11/23 () Eval.:***** 1.Underrated gem	Rank:1264949 Hardcover:Questor Tapes Tag:$95 1984/06 () Eval.:***** 1.He is compelled to seek his maker	Rank:1818253 Paperback:The Questor Tapes 1974 () Eval.:***** 1.A pure classic	Rank:3285598 Mass Market Paperback:The Questor Tapes 1974 () Eval.:***** 1.He is compelled to seek his maker	Paperback:QUESTOR TAPES 1979 ()	Paperback:Questor Tapes 1984 ()

Information about this title

Gene Roddenberry
Robert Foxworth

Statics of evaluation(The statics is updated once a day)

	Average	MovieRank	Deviation(Total)	Evaluation points(Total)	Best of the Best
Inside Japan	Very good(2.00)	791	48.85	2.00

Statics of activity

	Total Views	Comment	Evaluation
Inside Japan	497	1	1
Outside Japan	141	0	0

How others evaluated in Japan

Best

Very Good

Good

Normal

Bad

Very Bad

Worst

People

Percentage

0.0%

100.0%

0.0%

Added percentage

100%

100%

Summary

100%

Views for recent 8 days
Total 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1

Language Sorted by date Sorted by recommendation
English Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
Japanese Good
(Only Evaluation) Normal
(Only Evaluation) Bad
(Only Evaluation) All
(Only Evaluation) None
This reputation board

Language	Sorted by date	Sorted by recommendation
English	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None
Japanese	Good (Only Evaluation)	Normal (Only Evaluation)	Bad (Only Evaluation)	All (Only Evaluation)	None

Post your review / Top page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post to English version, please click here.

2006/02/02 Very good [Original Japanese review]
by スペ9 Provider: 3926 Host:3985 Browser: 5623
The masterpiece with which Android SF hid.
Although memory is quite ambiguous since I am not looking for 20 years or more, either, it can also be called the prototype of the data major of "Star Trek TNG." When investigating in the proposal this time, it was as if and what, and manufacture and draft proposal were the Jean rodden berries.
もん which is "the mystery of a hotel royal" of まんま TNG in the scene of a casino etc.
no -- truly -- being surprised -- it is the punch line which goes back to a 人類創 student First in a roll of the work "which will carry out ぜったい videotape recording if it broadcasts shortly" which exists partly.
It is no match for "the woman who traveled to the past." Signs that it broadcast by the several years before super channel in fact.
Right or wrong !.
One work to see once again.

Post your review / Top page

ALERT: You cannot use open proxy or TOR for posting your review. If it is detected, your access to this site will be prohibited.

Rule for reviews

This site allows you to write reviews for each title, but we don't allow you to criticize others' comment. Too bad or meaningless words are also not allowed. The comment which doesn't follow the rule will be deleted. If you find any comment which doesn't follow the rule, please notify us by clicking Suggest to delete.

Example to be deleted frequently

Favorite side
You dislike this one, then don't see it or comment this title
- Please go to the fan site. Anyone has the right to say what they feel in this site.

Disliking side
Do you like this one? You are stupid.
- Your view is only your view. Please concentrate on only the content of the title, not on others' comment.

Please use only English. If not, the comment will be deleted.

Your Name(Required)

Password (Required. more than 4 characters)

Your comment about this anime(Required)

Your evaluation of this title(Required)
You can choose the evaluation only once. After you post your evaluation, please choose comment instead of evaluation from the options.

Evaluation of this title(You can choose this only once)

Best!!
Very good
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
Worst

If you evaluated this title once, please choose comment instead of the evaluation.
Comment by the person who thinks this is good
Comment by the person who thinks this is normal
Comment by the person who thinks this is bad

Please choose appropriate option for readers.

Caution: Please post the evaluation which follows the rule.